Tag Archives: Securities and Exchange Commission

E-COMMERCE: Alibaba Probed Again by SEC, But Does it Matter?

Bottom line: Alibaba will avoid being penalized in a new SEC probe, but may be forced to modify some of its aggressive accounting practices in a compromise with the US securities regulator.

Alibaba in new SEC probe

I’m beginning to understand why e-commerce giant Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) has been aggressively building a team of Washington lobbyists, following announcement of its latest clash with a US government agency. This time it’s the securities regulator that’s tussling with the aggressive Alibaba, with word that the US Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the company for potential illegal accounting practices. The SEC is already well acquainted with Alibaba, following another unrelated probe of the company last year related to piracy in its online marketplaces. Read Full Post…

E-COMMERCE: Washington, Beijing Send Strong Signal to Alibaba on Fakes

Bottom line: The recent case involving criticism of Alibaba by Washington and Beijing over piracy should form a template for how the 2 governments can collaborate on commercial issues where they have common interests.

US warns Alibaba over fake goods

Washington and Beijing showed a rare sign of collaboration on commercial issues last week when the US sternly rebuked e-commerce giant Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) for widespread trafficking of pirated goods on its websites, reinforcing a similar message delivered by China at the start of this year. While it’s doubtful the US Trade Representative’s (USTR) office and China’s State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) consulted each other in their separate actions, the parallel moves showed just how effective the 2 governments can be when they work together in some of the many areas where their interests overlap.

That contrasts sharply with a more clashing style on many other issues like high-tech hardware security and new energy products, where both sides have similarly common interests but more often take actions that result in trade wars and angry verbal exchanges. Read Full Post…

INTERNET: New Intrigue at Qihoo With Coolpad Move, Insider Trading Charge

Bottom line: Qihoo is likely to soon take control of Coolpad by buying shares from its controlling stakeholder, while allegations of insider trading surrounding Qihoo’s recent buyout bid are unlikely to affect the company.

Qihoo eying Coolpad stake?

Security software specialist Qihoo 360 (NYSE: QIHU) is in a couple of noteworthy headlines as we end the week, led by an announcement that hints it could be close to buying a sizable stake in its smartphone partner Coolpad (HKEx: 2369). At the same time, Qihoo’s name has appeared in another headline that says a Guangzhou man is being accused of insider trading related to a plan announced last week to take the company private.

These 2 headlines aren’t really too related beyond the fact that they both involve Qihoo, whose aggressive business tactics and outspoken CEO have made the company a lighting rod for controversy. The Coolpad news reflects Qihoo’s recent aggressive push into smartphones, mirroring similar actions by many other Chinese Internet firms. The insider trading news is more reflective of China in general, where such dealing is rampant and largely tolerated by a securities regulator that has other larger issues on its agenda. Read Full Post…

INTERNET: Youku Joins Alibaba With SEC Probe

Bottom line: A new SEC probe into Youku Tudou’s accounting, following another probe into possible disclosure breaches by Alibaba, could undermine investor confidence in big Chinese Internet firms.

SEC probes Youku Tudou accounting

Just a month after e-commerce leader Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) said it was being probed for possible violations of US securities laws, former online video high-flyer Youku Tudou (NYSE: YOKU) revealed it is also being questioned by the US stock regulator for aggressive accounting practices that may have misled investors. The nature of the potential violations are quite different in each case, but both create a worrisome larger picture since they involve 2 of China’s biggest and most trusted Internet companies. Read Full Post…

INTERNET: High-Profile Alibaba Draws SEC Scrutiny

Bottom line: An SEC probe is likely to find that Alibaba misled investors by failing to disclose a government report about widespread piracy on its Taobao site, which will weigh on its shares for the rest of the year as it moves to fix the problem.

Alibaba under scrutiny by the SEC

E-commerce giant Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) is quickly learning that the publicity it craves can be a double-edged sword, with word the company is being investigated for failing to disclose important negative information in the run-up to its blockbuster IPO last year. I’ve never been a big fan of Alibaba’s tendency to hyperbole, even though I do think it’s a fairly well-run company and quite savvy in its core e-commerce area. My general view is that companies should let their performance be their loudest spokesman, and let investors decide the rest.

Alibaba founder Jack Ma is the antithesis of that approach, and loves to hype his company at every opportunity he can. His cheerleading skills helped Alibaba secure a valuation well above what many expected, allowing it to raise a record $25 billion in its New York IPO last fall. Now it seems that the US securities regulator is looking into whether Alibaba failed to disclose key information that could have significantly cooled investor enthusiasm for the company’s IPO shares. Read Full Post…

MULTINATIONALS: SEC, Big 4 Accountants Resolve China Clash

Bottom line: The SEC’s settlement with the Big 4 over their audits for US-listed Chinese firms is a positive step for everyone, and should be followed by a broader document sharing agreement between the US and China.

SEC, Big 4 settle China dispute

After more than 3 years of bickering, the US securities regulator has finally resolved a dispute with the Big 4 accounting firms over the way they handle their audits of New York-listed Chinese firms. The sudden settlement is a welcome development not only for both sides in the dispute, but also for the dozens of US-listed Chinese companies that employ the Big 4 as their official accountants. But all that said, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must still take one more step and sign a more comprehensive agreement with its Chinese counterpart to ensure it has access to the documents it needs when investigating New York-listed Chinese companies. Read Full Post…

China Auditors, US In Dangerous Game Of Brinksmanship

SEC takes new action against Big 4 auditors

I was a bit surprised to read that the US securities regulator is taking drastic action against the 4 main auditors for New York-listed Chinese firms, in its bid to get them to hand over records for companies suspected of financial fraud. Investors were also probably surprised by the move, which sparked a sell-off in shares of many of the US-listed Chinese firms that could suddenly lose their auditors if the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) executes its decision. That decision had the SEC say it will impose a 6-month suspension on the China arms of the “Big 4” US accounting firms from doing audits on any US-listed companies. Read Full Post…

SEC Charges MediaExpress With Fraud, Auditors Next?

SEC charges China MediaExpress with fraud

A series of accounting scandals that began more than 2 years ago has taken a toll on US-listed Chinese stocks ever since then, causing many smaller, unknown firms to de-list and even close. The biggest name to fail was financial services firm Longtop Financial, which once had a market cap in the billions of dollars but now no longer exists. But most of the victims so far have been smaller, obscure firms that no one had ever heard of before. But that could soon change. Read Full Post…

US-China Deal: A Big First Step in Stock Regulation

SEC in landmark deal with China stock regulator

Nearly two years after US securities regulators first held breakthrough meetings with their Chinese counterparts, the two sides have reached an agreement that marks a big step forward in making cross-border stock listings more transparent. The agreement will pressure overseas-listed Chinese firms and their independent auditors to become more accountable to both regulators and shareholders, helping to restore confidence to battered shares of these companies. Read Full Post…

Auditor Tussle With US Regulator, Defections Ahead 审计机构与SEC角力

Media are buzzing with word that the US securities regulator is once again tussling with major auditors over access to the accounting records of US-listed Chinese firms, in the latest chapter of an ongoing story; but what has me more intrigued is the scramble that is probably taking place behind the scenes, as those same auditors try to figure out what they will do when the inevitable happens and they are forced to share their records with the US Securities and Exchange Administration.

Read Full Post…

Deloitte, SEC Butt Heads As China Looks On 我觉得“德勤与美国证券交易委员会在中国公司问题上的冲突

The auditor for a Chinese firm whose collapse helped to spark the current confidence crisis for US-listed China stocks is refusing to hand over related documents to government investigators probing the case, capitalizing on mistrust and lack of cooperation between the US securities regulator and its Chinese counterparts to impede the investigation. Regulators in both the US and China need to move beyond this kind of turf war and learn to work together to tackle these sorts of issues, or risk seeing the reputations and stocks of some of China’s most prominent entrepreneurial companies undermined for many years to come.The latest twist in this ongoing saga that began a year ago saw the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which regulates US stock markets, charge Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu’s Shanghai office last week with failing to assist in a financial fraud probe against Longtop Financial, a Chinese financial services firm which collapsed last May after short sellers questioned some of its accounting. (SEC announcement) Several months after Longtop’s collapse, the SEC subpoenaed Deloitte in an effort to obtain some of the company’s accounting documents, and was rebuffed by the accounting firm, which all along has cited Chinese law as the reason for its refusal. In this and similar instances Deloitte and other international auditors are exploiting a loophole in the complex system allowing Chinese firms to list in New York. That system has left both the SEC and the Chinese securities regulator with very little power to actually oversee and investigate these companies for technical and territorial reasons. In a bid to close this loophole, SEC officials traveled to China last July to meet with government officials to discuss better cooperation, though it appears that little was accomplished. (previous post) While all this was happening, opportunistic short sellers launched a steady stream of similar attacks against other US-listed Chinese firms throughout last year, seeking to capitalize on the ballooning confidence crisis towards those companies. Some firms survived such attacks, but others were not so lucky and suffered similar fates to Longtop. The scandals went on to infect the entire sector of US-listed China stocks, causing their shares to plummet, and also cast a chill over the IPO market for Chinese companies looking to list abroad. The SEC has taken a number of steps to halt the confidence crisis, including launching several investigations like the one against Longtop. It has also worked to de-list shares of some smaller, more questionable Chinese companies that obtained their status by taking over existing publicly traded companies, a practice known as “back door listings.” But the impasse between the SEC and Deloitte spotlights the big limits the regulator faces when trying to conduct deeper probes into these firms – an obstacle it would never face from US-based firms. By failing to find a way to work together to address the problem, the US and China are giving auditors like Deloitte and their publicly traded clients a convenient and excuse to avoid producing documents that could implicate the companies for fraud, and also the accounting firms for lax oversight. If the two countries want to clean up this problem and restore confidence to the markets, they will need to find a way to work together effectively to force companies and their accountants to live up to their responsibilities as publicly traded firms. Otherwise, the result could be a prolonged confidence crisis for all US-listed Chinese stocks that would benefit nobody.

Bottom line: US-listed Chinese firms and their auditors will continue to evade regulatory scrutiny until the US securities regulator and its China counterparts learn to work together.

Related postings 相关文章:

Deloitte, SEC Clash in New Confidence Crisis Chapter

China, US Move to Ease Confidence Crisis 中美合作解决在美上市中国企业的信任危机

Qihoo: The Next Accounting Victim? 奇虎360:下一个会计丑闻受害者?