Tag Archives: GM

Geely Joins Chery on the Export Road 吉利加入奇瑞的出口车行列

Faced with a slowing home market and stiff competition from foreign-backed rivals, China’s big domestic auto brands are increasingly looking to developing markets to revive their flagging sales, with Geely (HKEx: 175) the latest to jump on the export bandwagon. A company executive says Geely, which made headlines a couple of years ago with its purchase of Volvo, aims to overtake domestic rival Chery in the next 2 years to become China’s leading car exporter. (English article) Geely is joining Chery in the drive to overseas markets as growth in China’s domestic auto market, the world’s largest, has slowed dramatically over the last year after Beijing retired many buying incentives designed to boost domestic consumption during the global financial crisis. As the market has slowed, China’s “big 3” domestic nameplates, Geely, Chery and BYD (HKEx: 1211), all of which specialize in lower end cars, have lost steady share to other domestic rivals with big-name foreign joint venture partners. Those rivals are turning up the heat even more with a recent series of new initiatives to enter the lower end of the market, which traditionally was dominated by the domestic brands. (previous post) Under its aggressive export expansion plan, Geely will open factories this year in Belarus and Uruguay, adjacent to 2 of the world’s 5 BRICS countries, namely Russia and Brazil. Chery, which has opened one plant in Venezuela and is building another in Brazil, was China’s export leader last year with some 160,000 cars shipped abroad, and has seen strong overseas sales in the first 2 months of this year as well. From my perspective, this overseas strategy looks like a smart move as China is arguably one of the world’s most advanced countries in terms of designing and building reasonably high-quality cars costing less than $10,000 each — a combination preferred by many developing market white collar urbanites who often can’t afford the pricier models offered by big-name foreign companies like GM (NYSE: GM) and Volkswagen (Frankfurt: VOWG). GM has recently discovered the lower end of the market can be quite lucrative, developing its Chevy Sail specifically for China 2 years ago. Since its release, the Sail has become one of the nation’s best selling models, providing further headaches for the domestic nameplates. If they are smart, which appears to be the case, Chery, Geely, BYD and other export-minded domestic automakers will accelerate their overseas plans, as they should have a 2-3 year head start over the big foreign names. If they hesitate, they could easily run into the same foreign competitors in overseas markets that are already rapidly eroding their profits at home.

Bottom line: Geely’s acceleration of its export drive looks like a smart move, allowing it to leverage its expertise in low-end cars to quickly grow in other developing markets.

Related postings 相关文章:

Nissan, VW Jump on China Brand Bandwagon 日产和大众进军中国低端车市场

Jaguar-Chery: Veto Ahead 奇瑞联手捷豹路虎建合资厂料难获批

Car Sales: Domestics Down, But Not Out 汽车销量:国产车下降,接近拐点

Nissan, VW Jump on China Brand Bandwagon 日产和大众进军中国低端车市场

A growing number of big foreign car makers are developing new low-end brands and models just for the China market, with Nissan (Tokyo: 7201) and Volkswagen (Frankfurt: VOWG) the latest to make moves in that direction. These new initiatives come as the foreign giants look to keep their growth alive in China’s slowing auto market, posing a major new challenge to domestic nameplates like Geely (HKEx: 175) and Chery, which have been rapidly losing share to their better funded, more experienced foreign rivals. These moves also follow on the phenomenal success of General Motors’ (NYSE: GM) 2010 launch of the Chevy Sail, its first low-end model developed just for China which has posted growth rates in the 50 percent range for much of the last year and is now one of the nation’s best-selling models. Let’s look at the latest news first, starting with Nissan, which last week formally began production of its Venucia line of cars developed just for the China market in its partnership with Dongfeng Motors (HKEx: 489). (English article) Nissan first announced Venucia just over a year ago, so the brand itself isn’t exactly news. But all eyes will be watching to see how quickly sales grow for the first model, the D50, which will be priced starting at around 70,000 yuan, or about $11,000, which is roughly comparable to the Sail’s starting price of about 60,000 yuan. Meantime, German media are quoting a Volkswagen executive saying the company is planning to launch its own new brand to make low-priced, high quality cars for developing markets, starting at an even lower 5,000 euros per car, or about $6,600. (English article) The reports indicate that China, already one of VW’s top global markets, would be one of the primary markets for this new initiative, and I would expect the German car maker could launch the initiative with its main Chinese partner, SAIC (Shanghai: 600104). These new initiatives follow similar ones by Honda (Tokyo: 7267), which last year launched a new brand called Everus with Chinese partner Guangzhou Auto; and GM’s launching of its own made-in-China brand, Baojun, with its China partners also last year. All of these big foreign names are hoping to capitalize on China’s auto market, now the world’s largest, to develop these new brands that will combine good quality with low prices, and then export those models and technology to other developing markets like Brazil and Russia. I would expect to see the handful of other major global automakers who haven’t joined the trend yet, including Ford (NYSE: F) and Toyoto (Tokyo: 7203), hop on this new bandwagon soon, turning up the pressure on what looks like an important new growth area for everyone. Of course that will mean a potentially difficult road ahead for Geely, Chery and other domestic names like BYD (HKEx: 1211), that have largely dominated the lower end of China’s car market to date while the foreign names focused on the higher end. Look for that competition to get hotter as these new brands start rolling out more new models, potentially sending many of the Chinese brands into the red.

Bottom line: Nissan and Volkswagen’s new forays into the low-end car space are part of a broader move by foreign automakers, putting growing pressure on domestic nameplates.

Related postings 相关文章:

Jaguar-Chery: Veto Ahead 奇瑞联手捷豹路虎建合资厂料难获批

Honda, Guangzhou Auto Chase GM-SAIC 本田广汽“理念”将上市

Geely Leans on Struggling Volvo 吉利依靠处于困境中的沃尔沃

Geely Leans on Struggling Volvo 吉利依靠处于困境中的沃尔沃

While most of China’s top automakers are relying on partnerships with major global brands to help get them through a domestic downturn expected to last for the next 1-2 years, Geely (HKEx: 175) is taking an interesting approach by turning to the struggling Volvo, with plans for a new joint venture. (English article) First off, I have to say that this is the first time I’ve heard of a company forming a joint venture with itself, since Volvo has been 100 percent owned by Geely since the Chinese automaker’s landmark purchase of the Swedish company 2 years ago. But perhaps more importantly, Volvo is a struggling, second-tier name that lacks the resources to be an effective partner for Geely, which itself is trying to bolster its China market position even as it struggles under a mountain of debt that it took on to buy the Swedish car maker. Let’s look quickly at this newly announced deal, which will see Geely and Volvo team up to develop a new brand for the China market, following a similar strategy by General Motors (NYSE: GM), which has launched a new brand, Baojun, with Chinese partner SAIC (600104), specifically for the China market. The big difference in this case is that Geely itself is already a well known Chinese brand, and I’m not sure why the company — whose resources are already quite stretched — is choosing to develop a new brand instead of focusing on reviving both its own Geely name as well as Volvo’s. Geely previously announced plans to set up 2 major new Volvo car manufacturing plants in China in a bid to boost its sales, and some of the reports are saying the establishment of this new joint venture may be partly designed to satisfy regulatory requirements in order to get the 2 new factories approved. Still, the plan to introduce a new brand, and also plans to develop green cars at the joint venture, seem like a total waste of resources for both Geely and Volvo, and will only lead to more operational and financial distractions just when the company should be focusing on its core Volvo and Geely brands. In fact, this latest plan is just the latest sign of a company in disarray following the Volvo purchase, which sadly is becoming normal for Chinese firms that buy struggling, major global assets at bargain prices, only to discover it’s much easier to buy such assets than to repair them. That said, this development of a new brand looks completely misguided, and is just the latest step of Geely’s downward spiral that could seriously damage the company.

Bottom line: Geely’s plans to form a joint venture with its Volvo arm is the latest sign of disarray for the former high-flyer, boding poorly for its future over the next 2-3 years.

Related postings 相关文章:

Car Sales: Domestics Down, But Not Out 汽车销量:国产车下降,接近拐点

Cars: US, Germany Clobber Japan, Domestic Rivals 美德汽车在华完胜日本和中国车商

Geely Choking on Volvo Debt, Weak Sales 吉利债台高筑

China Car Sales Sputter Out of the Gate 中国汽车销售龙年遭考验

China has just published its first monthly auto sales for 2012 and they aren’t pretty, boding poorly for the sputtering market in the Year of the Dragon. Of course, the figures for the month of January come with several major footnotes, most importantly the fact that sales were weak in 2012 as the Lunar New Year holiday fell during the month this year, whereas it fell in February for 2011. Still, the 16.5 percent decline in sales for the month marked the biggest decline in more than a decade, a sharp reversal for a market that was used to gains in the healthy double-digit percentage range for most of 2009 and 2010, and was still seeing healthy growth for most of 2011. (English article) Such a big decline means that just about everyone saw their numbers drop, with industry leader GM’s (NYSE: GM) sales down 8 percent for the month, about half the broader market decline. SAIC (Shanghai: 600104), GM’s main China partner and China’s biggest automaker, saw sales fall by a similar amount. The head of the association that compiles the results was quick to point out the Lunar New Year factor, and added that sales should increase by an even bigger 30 percent in Februrary, more than offsetting the January decline. He further added the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers predicts overall vehicle sales in China will grow about 8 percent this year, about double the growth rate of last year. The organization is usually quite conservative in its forecasts, and will argue that this year should see a return to more normal growth patterns after last year’s dramatic drop following the end of a wide range of government incentives designed to boost consumption during the height of the global downturn in 2009. But considering all the recent warning signs about rapidly slowing growth in Chinese consumption, I think the 8 percent forecast looks quite ambitious and would expect to see the figure revised downward several times, ending the year perhaps in the slight-growth range of 1-3 percent. As I’ve said before, the biggest victims in the slowdown will be domestic automakers without deep-pocketed foreign partners, with names like BYD (HKEx: 1211; Shenzhen: 002594), Geely (HKEx: 175) and Chery the most vulnerable. (previous post) I wouldn’t be surprised to see all 3 of these names slip into the red this year, nor to see one or 2 mid-sized players either become insolvent or simply get out of the business, in what will be a tough year ahead.

Bottom line: Weak auto sales for January, while influenced by timing of the Lunar New Year, foretell a difficult year ahead for the industry, with some top domestic names likely to slip into the red.

Related postings 相关文章:

◙  Cars: US, Germany Clobber Japan, Domestic Rivals 美德汽车在华完胜日本和中国车商

China Slams the Brakes on Automakers 中国为汽车行业踩刹车

Geely Choking on Volvo Debt, Weak Sales 吉利债台高筑

2 China Car Brands Set for Renaissance? “上海”和“红旗”汽车将重出江湖

A couple of reports in the China Daily this morning are saying that 2 iconic Chinese car nameplates, the Shanghai and Hongqi brands, could both be poised for comebacks soon in what looks like an interesting new prospect for the domestic auto market. If they go ahead with the plans, the reintroductions of Shanghai brand autos by SAIC (Shanghai: 600104), and Hongqi cars by FAW Auto could actually stand a reasonable chance of success, banking on nostalgia among Chinese consumers and both companies’ growing expertise at making dependable cars with solid demand after years of working with foreign partners. According to the China Daily, SAIC listed a Shanghai brand model in a recent catalog, and a company insider confirmed plans to revive the brand, which ceased production in 1991 as China’s largest automaker focused its energies on its 2 main joint ventures, one with GM (NYSE: GM) and the other with Volkswagen (Frankfurt: VOWG). (English article) Meantime, FAW is moving ahead with a 1.8 billion yuan plan of its own to develop a high-end Hongqi model that should go into volume production at the end of this year, with annual production set to rise to 30,000 units next year. (English article) The Shanghai-brand models sound aimed at the middle of the market, while the Hongqi — once considered China’s premier auto brand — is clearly aimed at the booming market for luxury cars. So the question becomes: are Chinese consumers prepared to spend the same money they usually reserve for big foreign names on domestic brands? My answer would be a “yes”, but only if they play their cards right, which could be a tricky proposition. A key element to success would be the nostalgia factor, meaning the companies would have to build a strong element of history into any marketing campaigns for the relaunch of these 2 brands — not something that either company has much experience in. Secondly, both companies will have to build models that are equally reliable and attractive to offerings from their foreign-branded joint ventures, and probably price them 10-20 percent below such comparable models. Again, this should be possible, but it will also require some effort and risk taking. Still, I’m cautiously optimistic that both of these initiatives could stand a chance for some reasonable success in the next 1-2 years, providing some refreshing and interesting new alternatives for a China auto market now dominated at the middle- and upper ends by big-name foreign brands.

Bottom line: Relaunches of the Shanghai and Hongqi auto brands could succeed if their manufacturers design interesting models and use the nostalgia factor in their marketing.

Related postings 相关文章:

Chery Finds Foreign Partner in Jaguar 奇瑞与捷豹路虎联姻前景堪忧

Cars: US, Germany Clobber Japan, Domestic Rivals 美德汽车在华完胜日本和中国车商

China Slams the Brakes on Automakers 中国为汽车行业踩刹车

News Digest: January 11, 2012

The following press releases and media reports about Chinese companies were carried on January 11. To view a full article or story, click on the link next to the headline.

══════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Nike (NYSE: NKE) Announces Plans for Greater China Headquarters (Businesswire)

China Mobile (HKEx: CHL) to Add 3 More TD-LTE Trial Cities – Source (English article)

Lenovo (HKEx: 992) Aims For 10 Pct of North America Market After Regional Rejig (Chinese article)

Perfect World (Nasdaq: PWRD) Responds to Recent Anonymous Accusations (PRNewswire)

GM (NYSE: GM) Sees Upping SAIC (Shanghai: 600104) JV Stake to 50% in ‘Coming Months’ (English article)

News Digest: January 10, 2012

The following press releases and media reports about Chinese companies were carried on January 10. To view a full article or story, click on the link next to the headline.

══════════════════════════════════════════════════════

GM (NYSE: GM) Leads U.S. Carmaker Gains in China (English article)

360Buy Makes High Profile Entry Into E-Books (Chinese article)

People’s Daily Website Launches IPO Process to Raise 527 Mln Yuan (Chinese article)

Mindray Medical (NYSE: MR) Gives Preliminary 2011 Operating Results, 2012 Revenue Guidance (PRNewswire)

WuXi PharmaTech (NYSE: WX) Provides Update of 2011 Financial Guidance (PRNewswire)

US, China in Auto Tit-For-Tat Tariffs 中美贸易战若升级将两败俱伤

In what should come as a big surprise to no one, China has singled out cars imported from the US for special duties after the US took similar action against Chinese-made tires in response to an anti-dumping complaint. This kind of tit-for-tat punitive tariff is relatively common and usually doesn’t do much damage as the amount of product affected is small, but in this case it provides some sobering insight over what could happen if another looming trade war involving solar cells escalates. In this latest instance, China will slap extra duties of up to 13 percent on US-made cars from GM (NYSE: GM) and Chrysler, and will even impose smaller punitive duties on cars made in the US by German auto makers like BMW (Frankfurt: BMW) and Daimler (Frankfurt: DAI). (English article) The move seems mostly symbolic, as the top 2 US automakers, GM and Ford (NYSE: F), already manufacture most of their models for the China market in China through their various joint ventures. Both the US and China are usually careful to keep these kinds of trade wars from getting out of control and affecting their broader economic relation, but a looming battle over alternate energy could soon test that formula, with the potential to blow up into a much bigger war that could deal a sharp setback to the drive to develop clean, renewable energy sources. Regular readers will know that of course I’m talking about the US investigation into unfair subsidies for Chinese solar cell makers, which now account for more than half of the world’s output, due in part to strong support from Beijing. A group advising the US body conducting the investigation has already determined that Beijing unfairly subsidizes its solar panel makers and recommended the levying of punitive tariffs, which are likely to come sometime early next year. Beijing has already hinted that it could retaliate with its own punitive tariffs for US-made polysilicon, the main ingredient used to make solar cells. That kind of escalation will ultimately benefit no one, either in the US or China, and could even deal a huge setback to a global solar industry already struggling through a sharp downturn.

Bottom line: China’s punitive levies against US cars looks like a retaliatory move for similar tariffs by the US against Chinese tires, and is unlikely to have any major impact on US automakers’ China sales.

Related postings 相关文章:

China Autos Set for Long Slowdown

Foreign Spending Spree Augers Woes for China Car Makers 外国车企大举投资中国 本土车企倍感压力

China Retaliates With Own US Solar Probe 中国启动对美可再生能源补贴调查

News Digest: December 7, 2011

The following press releases and media reports about Chinese companies were carried on December 7. To view a full article or story, click on the link next to the headline.

══════════════════════════════════════════════════════

GM (NYSE: GM) China Sales Growth Accelerates as Auto Demand Shrinks for Ford, Honda (English article)

◙ 54% of China Mobile (HKEx: 941) Data Card Users on 2G Networks – Memo (English article)

Qihoo 360 (NYSE: QIHU) Responds to the Citron Report (PRNewswire)

Merck Establishes New MSD R&D Asia Headquarters in Beijing (Businesswire)

Samsung (Seoul: 005930) Plans Flash Chip Line in China (English article)

Saab Rescue Gets New Life With Bank of China Role

The never-ending saga of a plan by 2 obscure Chinese firms to rescue dying Swedish automaker Saab has taken an interesting twist, with foreign media reporting that one of the Chinese partners has dropped out of the rescue group and been replaced by banking heavyweight Bank of China (HKEx: 3988; Shanghai: 601988). Under the original plan that stood little or no chance of success (previous post), the 2 Chinese firms, Youngman Lotus Automobile and Pangda Automobile (Shanghai: 601258), had been working for months on securing hundreds of millions of dollars in financing to rescue Saab, even as the Swedish company’s former owner, GM (NYSE: GM), was threatening to veto such a deal. I had said that even Youngman and Pangda could secure the necessary funding, their plan would ultimately get vetoed by Beijing due to inexperience of the 2 Chinese companies and Saab’s highly complex situation. But now the exit of Pangda and entry of Bank of China has completely changed the complexion of this rescue plan, and indicates that someone in Beijing may actually want to see the deal succeed. Foreign media say that under the deal now being discussed, Bank of China would replace Pangda, and collectively with Youngman would own just under 50 percent of Saab after providing their rescue financing. (English article) This new deal contains two elements lacking in the previous deal, giving it a much higher chance of success. From a financing standpoint, Bank of China’s participation guarantees the availability of needed funds, which are likely to run in the hundreds of millions of dollars. But perhaps more important, the participation of well-connected Bank of China gives the deal a much better chance  of winning necessary government approval. Clearly Beijing has taken an interest in this deal, though I’m not sure why as Saab still  has many structural issues that GM and others with much more experience failed to solve. Perhaps Beijing is just interested in Saab’s intellectual property, following the purchase 2 years ago of several older Saab model designs by Beijing automaker BAIC. Regardless of the reasoning, this latest rescue package looks to have a much better chance of success, meaning Saab may yet survive to see at least the end of 2012.

Bottom line: A Chinese plan to save Swedish automaker Saab stands a much better chance of success following the new entry of Bank of China into the rescue partnership.

Related postings 相关文章:

More Stumbles for Saab Rescue, 360Buy IPO 搭救萨博和京东商城IPO两计划注定命运多舛

Message to Saab: Don’t Count on China 萨博不应指望中国注资

BAIC – Scavenging for Parts in IPO Run-Up

Foreign Automakers Uncharged on China EVs 外国汽车商对中国电动汽车市场态度谨慎

A barely noticeable news brief on Nissan’s (Tokyo: 7201) electric vehicle, the Leaf, in today’s China Daily provides some insight on how the big foreign automakers see China as an EV market, spotlighting the uphill battle the country faces in developing this technology. Nearly every foreign automaker has announced one plan or another to import or even build its EVs or hybrid vehicles in China, with GM (NYSE: GM) giving plans for its Chevy Volt and Toyota (Tokyo: 7203) and Volkswagen (Frankfurt: VOWG) all announcing their own initiatives. But most of those plans have been vague at best, reflecting both the fact that technology still needs time to mature and also a high degree of skepticism that Chinese consumers are ready to spend big dollars on alternate energy vehicles, which are typically much more expensive than gas-powered cars and require charging infrastructure that most of China still lacks. The news brief hidden on the inside pages of today’s China Daily says that Nissan recently put 15 of its Leaf EVs on the road in the central Chinese city of Wuhan for test driving. A company spokesman further said that Nissan will continue the tests for a full 3 years, which sounds to me like an incredibly long period for this kind of technology if it was really interested in trying to sell these vehicles in China. In fact, there’s a very real possibility that the technology will be obsolete in 3 years or sooner, meaning the Leaf will probably never see any commercial sales in China at all. My guess is that other foreign automakers will proceed with similarly conservative plans for their EV and hybrid vehicles in China, as all wait to see if government incentives and needed infrastructure develop to make a serious effort worthwhile. If that is indeed what happens, look for EV and hybrid auto sales by foreign automakers in China to number in the thousands of units or less for each of the next 2-3 years, while domestic players like BYD (HKEx: 1211; Shenzhen: 002594) are left to make a more serious effort at developing what in all likelihood will be a very difficult market.

Bottom line: Foreign automakers like Nissan are taking a very conservative approach to developing China’s green vehicle market, and are unlikely to invest very much in the space.

Related postings 相关文章:

BYD True Test Begins With EV Consumer Roll-Out 比亚迪电动车上市 真正的考验刚刚开始

Beijing Sends Mixed EV Signals 中国应推进电动车基础设施建设和宣传

Hertz, GE Give Jolt to BYD Electric Cars 赫兹新项目为比亚迪“加油