I have to admire the determination Universal Studios, the theme park arm of Comcast’s (NYSE: CMCSA) NBC Universal, which, after 2 failed attempts to set up theme parks in China is making yet another bid to enter the market in the northeast port city of Tianjin. (English article) The foreign media report on the subject is quite vague, disclosed by a Tianjin official visiting Los Angeles, which sounds to me like talks are still in a very early stage and could easily go nowhere. But the idea is certainly intriguing and even sounds like a good business move for Universal if it can reach a deal, as Tianjin is already China’s sixth largest city and, more importantly, is just a half hour from Beijing via high speed rail link, giving any future park access to more than 20 million people within easy driving distance and millions more who come to Beijing as tourists. Increasingly wealthy Chinese have shown they are not afraid to spend the relatively expensive ticket prices of up to $100 per person to visit big-name theme parks, as evidenced by strong attendance for Walt Disney’s (NYSE: DIS) Hong Kong Disneyland. Still, getting such expensive theme parks approved in China can be quite difficult, as all require central government approval because of their big costs. Universal has already discovered this fact through the failure of 2 previous plans, both announced with fanfare about a decade ago for parks in both Beijing and Shanghai. The Beijing plan quickly fell apart, but the Shanghai one seemed to be moving ahead for several years when it also ran into trouble for reasons that were never fully explained and was ultimately scrapped. Disney has also found out how difficult it can be to build a park in China. The company was in talks with the Shanghai government for nearly a decade before finally closing a deal to build a $4.4 billion Disneyland resort in the city a couple of years ago. Back in Tianjin, Paramount Studios, the theme park and movie division of Viacom (NYSE: VIAb) was also in talks with the city’s government to build a theme park based on its characters and other property and even announced a deal for the 5 billion yuan project back in 2006. A quick Internet search on what ever happened to that project reveals that it was finally approved by the central government just a year ago, meaning it took another 4 years after the original announcement to get approval. Given the preliminary nature of Universal’s latest talks and the slow speed of Chinese approval, I wouldn’t expect to see a new Universal Studios park in Tianjin until 2020 at the earliest, and think it’s more likely the US entertainment giant will fail yet again in its China theme park hopes.
Bottom line: Universal Studios’ latest attempt to build a China theme park is likely to end in failure, but looks like a good idea in the unlikely case that it succeeds.
Related postings 相关文章:
◙ Disney Shanghai: A Great Hotel Play
Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) has finally won a round in its ongoing legal dispute over use of the iPad name in China, reflecting both a potential turning point in its ongoing spat with a Taiwan-linked company called Proview and also suggesting that justice may finally be coming in this convoluted case that is testing China’s fledgling court system. Of course, some might say the win this week in a Shanghai courtroom may also reflect the entry of politics into this case that has captured global headlines, as government officials finally take steps to help Apple, which is clearly much more important to China’s economy than the financially struggling Proview. But from my viewpoint, this latest development is more about making sure that true justice happens, and that companies realize that they can’t use China’s inexperienced legal system to play the kinds of games that occur elsewhere throughout the its business world. Let’s take a look at the actual new development, which has seen a Shanghai court rule that Apple can continue to sell its iPads in the city, one of China’s wealthiest and a much more important market than any of the smaller cities where iPads have been pulled from store shelves after a Shenzhen court ruled that Proview still owns the iPad trademark. (
The latest sign of trouble is emerging from China’s banking sector, where Minsheng Bank (HKEx: 1988; Shanghai: 600016), one of the nation’s more commercially-focused lenders, has just announced plans to raise up to $1.6 billion or more to bolster its shaky capital base, even as Beijing is encouraging banks to lend even more. Minsheng’s plan would see it issue new H-shares in Hong Kong, and could also see a convertible bond offering linked to its Shanghai-listed A-shares, according to a filing with the Hong Kong stock exchange. (
Dangdang (NYSE: DANG), China’s only major listed e-commerce site, has just released its latest quarterly results that show its losses ballooning, reflecting the overheated competition in the space that is already starting to hit many smaller companies and could soon even claim a bigger player. Dangdang’s latest report shows its loss jumped to 130 million yuan, or nearly $21 million, in the final quarter of last year, reversing a $2 million profit the previous year. (
After years of following the same tired old global banking names into and more recently out of China, it’s nice to suddenly see some refreshing new entries to this dynamic but also challenging financial services market. First there was an interesting tie-up last month that saw American Express (NYSE: AXP) investing in a Chinese mobile e-payments company called Lianlian (
There are some interesting new moves in China’s new and traditional media spaces, with Facebook, one of the industry’s youngest players, reportedly looking for young Chinese software programmers while the New York Times (NYSE: NYT), one of the oldest players, is taking a gamble on publishing in the market. Let’s take a look at Facebook first, as that’s the more interesting of the 2 developments as the company prepares for its highly anticipated multibillion-dollar New York IPO. Just last week I wrote that Facebook had registered a number of its trademarks in China (
While most of China’s top automakers are relying on partnerships with major global brands to help get them through a domestic downturn expected to last for the next 1-2 years, Geely (HKEx: 175) is taking an interesting approach by turning to the struggling Volvo, with plans for a new joint venture. (
The confidence crisis for US-listed China stocks has taken an interesting twist with the start of a bidding war for AsiaInfo-Linkage (Nasdaq: ASIA), one of the oldest US-listed China firms. The development underscores the fact that despite questionable accounting practices at many smaller US-listed Chinese firms, there are still many good companies in the market that may look like good values for buyers wanting to take advantage of depressed share prices that have resulted in cheap valuations. On the IPO front, meanwhile, a steady stream of noise from e-commerce giant 360Buy, which also goes by the name Jingdong Mall, indicates the company may be getting close to making its first public filing for a public offering that it first announced plans for last fall. Let’s look at AsiaInfo first, as the new bidding war could be the first in a new string of buyout offers for healthy US-listed Chinese firms whose shares have tumbled by 50 percent or more in the last year after a series of accounting scandals. Media are reporting that big-name US private equity firms including KKR and TPG are eying bids for AsiaInfo-Linkage that could value the company at $1 billion or more. (
