I wanted to start today with a report that shows that Chinese firms need some serious education in how to do good public relations and, equally important, need to understand when NOT to embark on high-profile campaigns. Just a day after I chastised telecoms equipment giant Huawei for its poorlyl-timed criticism of a US government decision (previous post), a much smaller company called Zhejiang Rongyao Chemical has issued a very public announcement saying it is suing pharmaceuticals giant Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) in the US for alleged breach of contract. (company announcement) From a quick glance at the headline, this action looked neutral to even perhaps slightly commendable, pitting a small Chinese firm seeking justice against one of America’s biggest drug makers. But a further reading hardly makes Zhejiang Rongyao look very sympathetic. It seems the company was selling a health additive used in chicken feed to a company that was later acquired by Pfizer, and that Pfizer this year unilaterally suspended a multi-year contract to buy the additive. So far so good. But then Rongyao discloses that Pfizer made its decision after the US Food and Drug Administration, the agency charged with ensuring food safety, released a report showing that chickens treated with the additive had high levels of inorganic arsenic in their livers. When the agency charged with ensuring national food safety makes a discovery like that, the natural reaction in the US is to stop using the product and wait for further tests. That’s obviously not the case in China, where profits and commercial agreements for a company like Rongyao are clearly more important than something like public safety. I’m not an expert on this kind of matter so can’t really comment too much on the safety issue, but clearly from a public relations perspective this is not a case that Rongyao should be publicizing quite so loudly. Its desire to keep feeding Americans chickens with high levels of arsenic in their livers due to its additives will hardly win the company much public sympathy in the United States.
Bottom line: Chinese firms like Huawei and Rongyao need to better understand the effective use of public relations in dealing with setbacks at home and abroad, or risk major public backlash.
Related postings 相关文章:
◙ Huawei Undermines US Push With Foolish Request 华为讨要说法很不明智唯有阻碍进军美国市场
◙ Lenovo Parent Goes Down to the Farm 联想控股“务农” 瓶装水里淘金
◙ Wal-Mart Pork Brouhaha Spotlights Food Risk 沃尔玛“标签门”表明中国严打决心
After a week or two of relative quiet, trouble in the group buying space has come bursting back into the headlines with the latest report of mass layoffs at one of the industry’s biggest players, 55tuan. (
China’s automobile association has lowered its sales outlook for 2011, dealing a further blow to the industry and especially to China’s embattled domestic car makers that specialize in the kinds of cheaper, more fuel-efficient models that look set to take the biggest hit as the market cools. The auto association’s latest numbers show that passenger vehicle sales rose an unexpectedly strong 8.79 percent in September, as buyers rushed to take advantage of government incentives that expired at the end of the month for smaller, more fuel efficient cars. (
In a move that shouldn’t surprise anyone, China top networking equipment maker Huawei, which has been working hard to win its first major business in the China-phobic US market, has been rebuffed in its bid for contracts to help upgrade emergency networks in America. This bid was a foolish one to start with, as these networks were already sensitive to begin with for obvious reasons, as many US politicians still see Huawei as an arm of the Chinese government intent on using its networking hardware for spying as well as commercial purposes. (
After staging a brief rally this week, solar module makers are returning to the defensive posture they have held for most of this year amid new reports that the slump in demand that has led to their worst-ever crisis seems to be accelerating rather than easing. Media are reporting the price of silicon, the main ingredient used to make solar cells, dropped a hefty 5.8 percent on October 10 from just a week earlier, in the latest indication that demand remains weak from an industry that built up massive new capacity during a brief boom under incentives rolled out by Western governments in 2009 during the global financial crisis. (
While leading Chinese PC maker Lenovo (HKEx: 992) focuses on its core computer business, its parent, Legend Holdings, seems intent on a strange diversification campaign in the run-up to its own IPO that could come in the next 3-4 years. That seems to be the message with the latest series of Chinese media reports that Legend sees long-term potential in both the agriculture (
A new flurry of reports about mislabeled products at some of Wal-Mart’s (NYSE: WMT) China stores would be almost comical if they weren’t true, spotlighting just how sensitive the issue of food safety and false advertising has become in the country. The latest media reports say some Wal-Mart store managers have been detained and more than a dozen stores temporarily closed in this new crisis. And the reason for all the brouhaha? Believe it or not, it’s all because someone discovered that some pork products were falsely labeled as “organic” when in fact they weren’t. (
There’s an interesting bit of news today that indicates relief may be in sight for some real estate companies, now suffering through the most sluggish property market since Beijing reintroduced private property ownership in the 1990s. But the latest move, which has seen the mid-sized city of Foshan roll back some of its most drastic real estate restrictions, probably reflects recent financial distress being felt by local governments rather than any desire by Beijing to help a real estate sector that looks more like a gambling casino than a true property market. According to a report in the China Daily, Foshan, a smaller city near Guangdong’s provincial capital Guangzhou, has eased restrictions rolled out last year under orders from Beijing that forbade local families from buying more than one home. It also eased selling restrictions, saying owners could sell their homes if they had owned them for 5 years or more. (
I’m going to be a bit controversial today and make a bold suggestion that may seem obvious to some, namely that China should privatize its big 4 banks and let them resume their role as the state-owned policy lenders that they were for their first 50 years. The idea may sound extreme, but it’s exactly the approach that Beijing seems to be taking first by forcing its banks to issue billions of dollars worth of new shares to shore up their balance sheets last year, and now by announcing it will buy up even more of their stock to support their sagging shares. The banks’ majority shareholder, the central government-controlled Central Huijin, provided few specifics other than to say it has started buying up shares in the top 4 lenders, ICBC (HKEx: 1398; Shanghai: 601398), China Construction Bank (HKEx: 939; Shanghai: 6019399), Bank of China (HKEx: 1398; Shanghai: 601398) and Agricultural Bank of China (HKEx: 1288; Shanghai: 601288). (