What do Venezuela and the tiny island nation of Saint Maarten have that China doesn’t? Starting on Friday, the answer will be the latest iPad, as Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) has just released the latest list of countries where its newest must-have product will go on sale and China is noticeably absent. Many observers might say that Apple is taking a cautious approach to China pending the resolution of a trademark dispute with a near-bankrupt company over the iPad name in the market. But in my view, the exclusion of China from the list is just as much about applying pressure on Beijing for a court ruling in its favor, and says more broadly that Apple could withhold its popular products in the future if it doesn’t believe it is being treated fairly in the market. After all, withholding Apple products could easily anger many Chinese consumers eager to have the latest hot product, perhaps prompting them to hold Beijing responsible. Furthermore, the absence of legally imported iPads will fuel a surge in smuggled products, costing China millions of dollars in lost import duties. But let’s take a look at the specific situation to put things in perspective. Apple announced the launch of its newest iPad on March 7, and the tablet PC went on sale about a week later in the US and several global markets, including Japan, Hong Kong and Singapore in Asia. Another group of countries, mostly in Europe, joined the list about a week later, as sales surged to more than 3 million just 3 days after the initial launch. Now Apple has just announced a third group of countries that will receive the new iPad starting April 20, including the likes of tiny markets like Saint Maarten and Venezuela. (company announcement) But nowhere on the list is there any mention of China, and it’s unclear if Apple will even attempt to launch the new iPad here despite receiving a green light last month from a Shanghai court to keep selling the product in that city until a final ruling in the current trademark dispute. An initial ruling last year in that dispute went in favor of the near bankrupt company, Proview, which claims to own the name due to what looks like a technical error that saw it fail to transfer the trademark after Apple thought it bought the name several years ago. Now the case is being heard under appeal, with a ruling likely in the next few months. I personally agree with Apple’s decision to withhold the new iPad from China for now. Countless disappointed Chinese consumers are likely to voice their frustration, while Apple can conveniently blame its decision on the dispute. In the meantime, Beijing will sure be searching for a way to work out the dispute in a way that makes everyone happy and shows the world it is dedicated to fairness in settling this kind of business dispute.
Bottom line: Apple’s withholding of the new iPad from China is partly due to an ongoing trademark dispute, but is also partly designed to pressure Beijing for fair treatment in the case.
Related postings 相关文章:
◙ More Proview Empty Talk in iPad Dispute 唯冠寻求禁售新款iPad将是徒劳之举
◙ Apple Bytes: Labor, a State Visit and Baidu 库克中国行猜想:他在下一盘很大的棋
◙ Apple CEO Cook Stirs Up Guessing Firestorm 苹果CEO库克低调访华意欲何为?
As China’s mainstream car market shows increasing signs of little or no growth this year, General Motors (NYSE: GM), one of the industry’s top players, is finally noticing the luxury segment still has plenty of growth potential by making a very late move into the space with its upscale Cadillac brand. Now the big question will be whether luxury sales are still so strong in the year or 2 it will take GM to start making Cadillacs in China, especially as Beijing takes moves to restrict luxury car buying by government organizations. (
I have no idea what’s happening behind the scenes at 360Buy, but a growing number of mixed signals from this online retailing giant seem to portray a company sinking into turmoil, including the latest news that it is now getting into the real estate services business. (
I was highly skeptical at first about a rumor that Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) might be in talks to sell its Motorola Mobility (NYSE: MMI) handset business to telecoms equipment and cellphone giant Huawei; but the more I think about it the more it makes sense, leading me to speculate that the rumor may actually be true. The source of all the buzz is actually quite small, namely a small mention at the very end of a
There’s quite a bit of new listings and delistings news out there today, led by word that car rental specialist China Auto’s (NYSE: CARH) stalled IPO is finally moving ahead, although only after being cut by half as overseas investors continue to show little or no interest in new Chinese offerings. That news comes as another auto rental firm with a similar name, AutoChina (OTC: AUTCF) has announced it is being sued by the US securities regulator, following its delisting from the Nasdaq last year at the height of the confidence crisis against US-listed China stocks. Last but not least, People’s Daily Online, the web site of the official newspaper of the Communist Party, is moving ahead with its own landmark IPO, kicking off the roadshow for an offering that will undoubtedly get a warm welcome from cash-rich Chinese investors who are also party members. Let’s start with China Auto, which has said it now hopes to raise up to $158 million from its IPO, with its New York trading debut set for April 26. (
UnionPay, China’s equivalent of Visa (NYSE: V) and MasterCard (NYSE: MA), is making headlines today with some impressive numbers showing its profit has exploded in the last few years, as it looks to highlight its growth story in the run-up to what could well become the blockbuster Chinese IPO of the year. Of course this is all just my guessing, as UnionPay, whose stakeholders include most of China’s major banks, has never given a detailed timeline for such an offering, which I would expect to come as a dual listing in Hong Kong and Shanghai as soon as the second half of this year. Such an offering would have huge appeal for investors, as it would offer a strong financial services alternative to China’s big banks, which often behave more like policy lenders than true commercial banks and, as a result are now in the midst of a crisis after sharply boost their lending under a directive from Beijing at the height of the global financial crisis. By comparison, UnionPay operates a national electronic payments settlement network similar to the Cirrus and Plus networks operated by MasterCard and Visa, which is much less vulnerable to the whims of government policy. UnionPay has also been aggressively expanding the network globally, leveraging its strong base in China to sign a steady stream of major agreements to extend its network to major global banks and other financial services firms. One of the latest moves in that direction saw the company sign a deal last August to link its network with US Bancorp (NYSE: USB), a top US player, and more recently it inked another deal with another US company called WorldPay. That aggressive expansion and the growth of the financial services industry in China is apparent in UnionPay’s bottom line, which has grown 10-fold over the last 5 years as its profit reached just over 1 billion yuan in 2011, or about $160 million. (
Just a day after writing about a rumored merger between 2 mid-sized group buying sites, we’re getting even bigger news that the long-awaited consolidation in the overcrowded space is accelerating with word that 55tuan, one of the industry’s top players, is taking over operation of the group-buying business of a major player called Ganji. (