In what I can only describe as a stroke of brilliant PR by China’s top two oil companies, both PetroChina (NYSE: PTR; HKEx: 857) and Sinopec (NYSE: SNP; HKEx: 386) have posted very strong first quarter numbers but also managed to draw attention to how much they’ve suffered due to high oil prices.
(English article) Sinopec in particular was very creative, saying it kept down its refining losses during the quarter by relying on crude oil stockpiles it accumulated when oil prices were lower. PetroChina, meantime, relied on its crude oil business to offset its own massive refining losses. The PR blitz underscoring the problems they face comes as Chinese consumers express growing frustration with high gas prices, and as Beijing grows increasingly worried about inflation. Analysts are saying to look for Beijing to grant another price increase in the not-too-distant future, and such an increase may indeed be coming. But with crude oil prices unlikely to go much higher and perhaps even come down as the Libya situation plays out, don’t look for an inflation-worried Beijing to approve any major hikes in gas prices anytime soon.
Bottom line: PetroChina and Sinopec have launched an effective PR campaign to highlight losses from their refining operations, but don’t look for any major gasoline price hikes from Beijing.
中石油<0857.HK><601857. SS>和中石化<0386.HK> <SNP.N>一季度财报喜人,但却成功地让大家注意到他们的炼油业务是如何饱受油价飙升之苦的。我只能说,这是一个高明的公关策略。中石化尤其有创意,称其一季度控制住炼油业务亏损原因靠的是在油价较低时囤积的原油库存。中石油则同时宣称,依赖原油业务抵消了炼油业务的大幅亏损。在中国消费者对高油价日益不满,中国政府对通货膨胀日益担心之际,这两家公司的公关策略凸显了两家公司所面临的问题。分析人士表示,估计在不久的将来,中国政府将批准燃料油再次涨价。但实际上在原油价格不大可能变得更高,而且随着利比亚动荡的局势趋向平稳,甚至可能会下跌。因此别指望中国政府允许油价大幅度提升。
一句话:中石油和中石化的公关策略卓有成效,强调了其炼油业务的亏损,但别指望中国政府会允许油价大幅上涨。
Related postings 相关文章:
◙ Sinopec Fights Back With Feeble PR Blitz 中石化公关仍不到位
◙ Sinopec Scandal Points to Big Oil Crackdown 中石化:“天价酒”事件实为敲山震虎?
◙ PetroChina Gets in Bed wtih Saudis to Secure Oil Supplies 中石油的沙特“情缘”
In the brief but colorful race to market between China’s top two social networking sites, both often called the Facebook of China, early leader Renren seems determined to take the prize despite a number of scandals surrounding its bid. In the latest of those, the chairman of its auditing committee, a foreigner with bountiful experience in Chinese start-ups, has resigned due to an unrelated accounting scandal at another company, Longtop Financial (NYSE: LFT), where he is now CFO. (
(Tokyo: 6758) and Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) have all largely avoided the China gaming console market so far. In a nutshell, rampant piracy makes selling legitimate gaming titles — the main profit source for the console business — virtually impossible in China. Perhaps Lenovo has found a way to beat the pirates as it’s certainly very familiar with the China market. But if it hasn’t, which I suspect will be the case, this could become yet another failure for the company and also a major distraction from products it should be pursuing.
It seems that ZTE (HKEx: 763; Shenzhen: 000063), already reeling from more recent setbacks than I can recount in this space, has just received yet another blow in its own backyard from crosstown rival Huawei Technologies. To be more precise, the actual blow has come in Europe where Huawei has sued ZTE for stealing its intellectual property, Chinese media are reporting (
at around 1 percent, I would advise people to focus on the fact that Beijing has indicated that billions more in capital raising is likely to come (
In the latest twist in the increasingly complex race to market between Renren and Kaixin, China’s two Facebook wannabes, Renren has apparently confessed to US stock regulators that its initial public filing significantly inflated its user numbers. According to Chinese media, Renren has told the SEC in a new filing that it added 5 million new users in the first quarter, not a bad figure but quite a bit less than the 7 million it originally reported. (
While I admire Huawei for wanting to keep posting triple-digit growth (heaven forbid they should slip into double digits!), it does in many ways feel like this company has become obsessed with growth at any cost and may be losing its common sense. I’m not saying it can’t make such a transition — after all, IBM (NYSE: IBM) made such a move, and HP (NYSE: HPQ) is moving in that direction. But given that such transitions can be difficult — Lenovo (HKEx: 992) tried and failed at a similar move less than a decade ago — Huawei and rival ZTE (HKEx: 763; Shenzhen: 000063) might be better advised to focus on developing new products that take advantage of their expertise as low-cost, quality manufacturers.
In a major about-face, Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), after initially leaving China off its Asia launch list for the iPad 2 (
I love the imagery associated with the latest blockbuster deal on China’s fast food scene, which would see YUM brands (NYSE: YUM), operator of KFC and Pizza Hut restaurants, swallow up Little Sheep (HKEx: 968), China’s leading hot pot chain. (
like Taiwan, Japan and South Korea, where hot pots are also popular. The big potential obstacle in all this is China’s regulator, which has shown an increasing tendency to use its anti-trust powers as a political tool, as it did two years ago when it vetoed Coke’s (NYSE: KU) proposed purchase of leading chinese juice maker Huiyuan (HKEx: 1886). If the regulator is smart, it will approve this deal and ignore any nationalistic sentiment, or risk further damaging its reputation as an objective and impartial anti-trust body.