Video sharing site Xunlei may be delaying its upcoming IPO due to the China sell-off on Wall Street (previous post), but the bloodbath doesn’t seem to be deterring rival site Tudou. Chinese media are reporting that Tudou, whose name means potato in Chinese, has revived stalled plans for a New York IPO, after suspending those plans last fall while founder Gary Wang worked through a messy divorce. (English article; Chinese article) The reports say Tudou, which has yet to turn a profit, has filed its initial documents with the US securities regulator, and that it aims to list by the end of this month. Many will recall that Tudou was in a race with another rival, Youku (NYSE: YOKU), last fall to become China’s first publicly listed video sharing site — a race that Tudou ultimately lost when Wang’s divorce proceedings got in the way. Later reports emerged that Wang might be looking to sell Tudou, though the company insisted all along it was still aiming for an IPO. (previous post) This current plan doesn’t really surprise me, though I question how smart it is. Wang, like many other Chinese entrepreneurs, clearly wants to stay at the head of his company, hence his preference for an IPO versus a sale of Tudou to a rival. Furthermore, he’s probably so relieved that his divorce is finally resolved that he’s blind to the fact that his company — already less attractive due to its money-losing status — will IPO into a market where sentiment toward new China listings has grown ice cold over the last 2 months. That shift has already prompted rival Xunlei, which has a much stronger financial background, to delay its IPO. If it moves forward with its plan to list in the next couple of weeks, which seems likely, look for Tudou shares to price weakly, and to stumble out of the gate with a weak to outright disastrous trading debut.
Bottom line: Tudou’s rush to IPO into one of the weakest markets in more than a year will end with a weak pricing and potentially disastrous trading debut.
近来中国概念股在华尔街遭遇滑铁卢,中国视频分享网站迅雷可能会推迟IPO进程,但竞争对手土豆网似乎不为所动。据中国媒体报导,土豆网创始人王微与前妻已就离婚财产纠纷达成和解,网站之前暂停的IPO计划重回正轨。报导称土豆网已向美国证券交易委员会提交监管文件,计划最迟本月底前上市。很多人应该都记得土豆去年秋天与另外一家竞争对手优酷网<YOKU.N>展开上市赛跑,当时土豆因王微离婚纠纷而在这一竞赛中最终败北,优酷最终成功上市,成为中国首家上市的视频分享网站。稍後曾有报导称王微有意出售土豆,不过公司一直坚称目标仍为IPO。我虽怀疑土豆当前计划是否明智,但对此举本身我并不感意外。王微像很多中国企业家一样,明显希望继续掌舵,所以他会倾向於IPO,而不是把土豆出售给竞争对手。而且,离婚纠纷终於尘埃落定,王微大大松了一口气,以至于根本没有注意过去两个月来华尔街对中国概念股的态度跌至冰冷。华尔街的态度转变已经让迅雷推迟了IPO计划。如果未来几周土豆继续推进IPO,土豆股价定价可能非常弱,上市首日就有可能惨淡破发。
一句话:在目前华尔街冷眼对待中国概念股的情况下,土豆匆忙赴美IPO,最终定价可能很低,而且上市首秀可能灾难收场。
Related postings 相关文章:
◙ Xunlei’s Rich Parentage List Grows 迅雷投资方阵容强大
◙ Youku Ambushes Market with Massive Follow-on, Investors Bite 优酷利用投资者心理大捞一笔
ICBC holds a 20 percent stake in Standard Bank, its main partner in Africa. Without knowing too much about Standard Bank’s Argentine businesl, I have to say that at least on the surface this deal looks like exactly the kind of global M&A that ICBC should be pursuing. I really like ICBC’s tie-up with Standard Bank, one of Africa’s top lenders, which has helped to raise ICBC’s profile and portfolio in Africa by drawing on Standard Bank’s strong ties to the continent. Argentina, and more broadly Latin America, is another major emerging market where ICBC could also do well if it has the right local partners. Standard Bank’s Argentine unit looks like it could fit that description, qualifying as a solid mid-sized player with a market cap of around $1 billion. These are exactly the kinds of overseas markets that ICBC should be focusing on, seeking to draw on its broader experience as an emerging market lender and also homing in on locations where Chinese firms are actively making investments. I would look for more deals of this size in emerging markets from ICBC in the year ahead, both with Standard Bank and also on its own.
Chinese firms are finally starting to take action in a bid to halt the New York sell-off that has seen some of their shares lose half their value or more in the last few weeks. Leading the charge are chip designer Spreadtrum (Nasdaq: SPRD) and online retailer Dangdang (NYSE: DANG), which have both announced share purchasing programs to try and halt their recent slides. (
Number portability — the ability to change mobile carriers without changing your phone number — is slogging ahead in China at a snail’s pace, and I’ve no doubt that resistance from the carriers, most notably China Mobile (HKEx: 941; NYSE: CHL), is to blame. People often resist switching their mobile company, even when other carriers offer more attractive plans, because they don’t want to change their phone number and risk being unreachable by their old contacts. Number portability was designed to solve this problem, allowing someone to switch carriers without losing their old phone number. While most developed countries have had number portability for years, China, after years of talk, finally conducted a 6-month trial program in Tianjin and Hainan that just wrapped up in May. In what should come as no big surprise, only 50,000 people managed to change carriers while keeping their old phone numbers in that time, or just a tenth of people who actually applied to do so. (
Just a day after announcing an unusual plan to build wind power plants in the US (
Alibaba to better monetize Taobao so it can get back some of its investment. Taobao started out largely as a C2C site, in direct competition with eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY). But that business has failed to ever generate much money due to Alibaba’s repeated refusal to charge any listing or transaction fees for the site. Taobao Mall grew up later, and is clearly a more attractive business as sellers are mostly commercial retailers who don’t mind paying a fee to sell their products online, which carries much lower overhead than traditional real-world stores. Following this split-up, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Taobao Mall publish some financials relatively soon to start drumming up support for an IPO in as little as the next 12 months. After all, Softbank has waited nearly a decade to get some return out of its original investments in both Alibaba and Taobao and now it looks like the wait could finally be almost over.
s post
After a few months of silence from BYD (HKEx: 1211), the electric vehicle aspirant backed by US billionaire Warren Buffett has announced a new pilot program to test out its electric buses in the German city of Frankfurt. (
Anyone who doubts that China Unicom (HKEx: 762; NYSE: CHU) is rapidly posing a serious challenge to dominant mobile carrier China Mobile (HKEx: 941; NYSE: CHL) should look no further than the latest reports of a newly announced tie-up between Unicom and Sina (Nasdaq: SINA). (
n, operates a 3G mobile Internet system based on the world’s most popular standard, which is supported by plenty of well-proven handsets, including Apple’s (Nasdaq: AAPL) iPhone, and efficient infrastructure networking equipment. Sina’s new tie-up, though probably not exclusive, marks a huge affirmation that China’s top Internet content provider sees Unicom as the leading the mobile Internet in China for at least the next couple of years. If its guess is correct, and I think there’s a good chance it will be, we should see Unicom steadily take share from China Mobile in the 3G space, and perhaps even surpass it by the end of next year.
which caused Yahoo’s shares to drop sharply when the news got out. Ma justified the move saying that China was preparing to issue its first round of licenses for domestic online payment companies, and that Alipay might not qualify for a license due to its foreign ownership. According to the reports, Yahoo and Softbank both thought their stakes in Alibaba wouldn’t prevent Alipay from getting a license, and I’m increasingly convinced that this argument has merit. What Ma hasn’t said in all this is that China is preparing to also license foreign companies to provide domestic online payment services later this summer, so the whole debate over domestic versus foreign control of such companies does seem to be a moot point. In that light, Ma’s defensive posture seems much more understandable and I wouldn’t be surprised to see Alipay return to Alibaba Group as soon as late this year. In the process, Alibaba may also have to pay Yahoo millions of dollars to help it settle a class-action shareholder lawsuit against it related to this mess.