Journalist China

Business news from China By Doug Young.
Doug Young, journalist, has lived and worked in China for 20 years, much of that as a journalist, writing about publicly listed Chinese companies.

He is based in Shanghai where, in addition to his role as editor of Young’s China Business Blog, he teaches financial journalism at Fudan University, one of China’s top journalism programs.
He contributes regularly to a wide range of publications in both China and the west, including Forbes, CNN, Seeking Alpha and Reuters, as well as Asia-based publications including the South China Morning Post, Global Times, Shanghai Daily and Shanghai Observer

More Turbulence For Alternate Energy

The Year of the Dragon is off to a dubious start for China’s alternate energy sector, with solar panel makers facing stiff resistance in both the US and Germany, 2 of the world’s biggest markets, and now wind power equipment makers coming under similar fire. The solar story in the US is actually an old one by now, following the launch of an investigation into unfair subsidies by Beijing for its solar panel makers last summer. (previous post) But what’s new on that front is that the US body that rules on such matters is likely to make its final decision soon, which will likely result in punitive tariffs that will send a chill through the solar energy market. A US group that helped to bring the original complaint has just put out a new analysis saying Chinese companies have been rushing to import their panels to the US in anticipation of a ruling against them, with imports up more than 100 percent since last July when the probe first began. (English announcement) Usually I’m a little skeptical about this kind of industry announcement, but in this case I wouldn’t be surprised if the numbers are actually relatively accurate, as Chinese producers like Suntech (NYSE: STP), Trina (NYSE: TSL) and Yingli (NYSE: YGE) certainly have reason to stockpile panels in the US to weather a coming storm that could see punitive tariffs remain for a year or more until the US and China settle their differences. Meantime, the solar panel makers are also facing new uncertainty in Germany, one of their other major markets, as that country said it plans to phase out many incentives to boost the installation of new solar capacity by 2017 and is already starting to make changes. (English article) The loss of 2 such major markets won’t be good for the industry in the short term, though it should hasten the introduction of new technologies that could boost efficiency and help the industry finally achieve its real goal of making a product that can survive on its own based on real economics rather than government subsidies. Meantime, the wind industry could soon be coming under similar pressure, as the US is also launching an investigation into unfair subsidies for Chinese wind tower makers. (English article) This action could hit another promising group of companies, though it should be less damaging as it focuses on makers of lower-tech towers as opposed to the more critical wind turbines that actually produce electricity. Still, this kind of trade war won’t help the industry’s development as a whole, and all parties would be much better served finding a less combative way to address the issue of state subsidies.

Bottom line: Looming US punitive tariffs and a winding down of German subsidies bode poorly for the battered solar industry in 2012, with at least 2 more years of pain likely.

Related postings 相关文章:

Solar Matures With Foxconn Entry

India Turns Up Heat on Solar With New Probe

Beijing Boosts Solar In Latest Mixed Signal 中国扩张太阳能行业发展 解决与美争端立场混乱

CNOOC Parent Comes to Rescue

The week-long Chinese New Year holiday is winding down in mostly quiet fashion, but a newly announced settlement for damages from a leaking oil well co-owned by CNOOC Ltd (HKEx: 883; NYSE: CEO) is making headlines by once again shining a spotlight on the shell games that big state-owned Chinese companies play. Under the new settlement, the publicly listed CNOOC basically escapes completely harmed in terms of monetary liability, as its state-run parent is taking all the financial responsibility for the mess, along with joint venture partner ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP). (company announcement) Under the settlement with China’s Ministry of Agriculture, CNOOC’s state-run parent, whose books are completely separate from the listed company, will commit 250 million yuan, or a relatively minor $40 million, into a fund aimed at cleaning up the mess from a series of leaks at an oil field operated by ConocoPhillips in the Bohai Bay off the Northeast Chinese coast. ConocoPhillips will contribute another 100 million yuan to the fund, and will also put another 1 billion yuan into a fund to compensate fishermen and others who have been affected by the spill. CNOOC shareholders must surely be applauding this settlement, as it signals that the company will face little or no liability from this accident, even though the listed company is the official joint venture partner in the project, and actually cited the problem when it had to downwardly revise its 2011 output target last August. (previous post) So the bottom line in this saga seems to be that the state-run parents of major Chinese resource companies will shoulder most or all of the liability for any accidents that occur at their projects, while the listed companies will be able to reap all the benefits from new output and other production. If I were an investor, I would certainly be interested in this kind of company since there is little or no downside from accident liability, which is one of the major risk factors of such companies. CNOOC shares rose slightly on the news in New York, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see a nice mini-rally for the company, along with peers Sinopec (HKEx: 386; Shanghai: 600028) and PetroChina (HKEx: 857; Shanghai: 601857; NYSE: PTR) when this new reality slowly sinks in with investors.

Bottom line: The assumption of liability by the state run parent of CNOOC in a major oil spill shows that listed energy firms will face little or no risk from such major accidents.

Related postings 相关文章:

Sinopec Latest Victim of Environmental Scrutiny 中石化管道工程因环保计划不足被叫停

Stumbling CNOOC Replaces Chief Executive 中海油换将李凡荣接棒CEO

CNOOC Woes Spotlight Environmental Perils

Sina Tests Weibo Demand With Paid Offering 新浪试水微博增值收费服务

A half year after spinning off its Weibo unit with an aim to earning profits from the wildly popular microblogging service, Sina (Nasdaq: SINA) is taking the first step to generating significant new revenues from the business by rolling out a new premium paid service. The strategy is certainly necessary if Sina ever wants to earn a profit from Weibo, and I even like the fact that it’s charging a very modest fee for the service, at least initially, which should help attract customers. But I’m still quite skeptical that the strategy will actually work, as it’s always hard to get people to pay for something they’ve grown accustomed to getting for free. Let’s backtrack a moment and look at the details of this latest development, which has Sina rolling out a service that will allow Weibo users to get the new premium service for the modest fee of 5 yuan a month or 50 yuan a year, translating to less than $1 per month. (English article) The new service will allow users to get SMS notifications for some of their incoming posts — an offering that doesn’t sound that interesting since many users already access Weibo over their mobile phones. In theory the new service could be a major revenue generator, since the company could generate more than 1 billion yuan in annual revenue if even just 10 percent of Weibo’s 250 million users signed up for the service. But as I said already, the bigger issue will be getting people to pay for a service that they’re used to getting for free. E-commerce leader Alibaba Group has found out that such a switch can indeed be difficult, as reflected by the lackluster performance of its Taobao online auctions service. That service made headlines 7 years ago when it ultimately drove global leader eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY) out of the China market by offering its services for free; but since then, Alibaba has had a difficult time making significant profits from the business, due in large part to the fact that users don’t want to pay for something they’ve always received for free. I suspect that Weibo will learn a similar lesson with this latest premium offering, and would advise Sina to look at other options in its drive to make the platform profitable, including developing entirely new services that can leverage Weibo’s large user base.

Bottom line: Weibo’s new premium service is likely to fail due to lack of interest from users who are accustomed to getting the service for free.

Related postings 相关文章:

Sina’s Weibo Suffers New Setback With Lawsuit 吉林市驻京办可能起诉新浪微博

Microblog Clampdown: Only Chapter 1? 实名制向网络行业吹去冷风

Watch Out Weibo, Weixin Is Growing 新浪微博要小心腾讯微信要崛起

Fading Results Tarnish Education’s Luster

New Oriental (NYSE: EDU) and TAL Education (NYSE: XRS), two of China’s biggest names in the education services sector, have just posted new quarterly results that are less than inspirational, showing the formerly red-hot education sector may rapidly be losing its luster. Disappointment at the latest results is reflected in the companies’ stocks, with TAL shares dropping about 2 percent after its latest quarterly report showed its profit slipped nearly 40 percent even as revenues rose 70 percent. (company announcement) Shares of New Oriental have fared even worse, tumbling 11 percent after its reported an operating loss earlier this week even as its revenue grew by a healthy 38 percent. (results announcement) It seems that both companies are getting hit by the same phenomenon in a sector that has seen explosive growth over the last few years from Chinese looking to improve themselves and their children through outside classes that these companies offer. On the one hand, competition in the space is getting more intense, with a growing number of foreign companies such as Pearson (London: PSON) and Disney (NYSE: DIS) entering the space in the last few years to capitalize on demand. (previous post) At the same time, these companies are all facing the same problem, namely the lack of scalability for this industry. Whereas Internet and tech companies can significantly lower their costs as their number of customers grows due to the nature of their business, the same isn’t really true for education services since, at the end of the day, each student requires a relatively fixed amount of costs in the form of classroom space and salaries for teachers to instruct the classes. That potent combination means that even though revenues may continue to grow at a healthy pace for the next few years, especially as these companies tap demand in mid-sized and smaller cities, the cost of those revenues is likely to stay constant at best, and could even rise due to the stiff competition, meaning profits won’t grow and could even shrink more. If that’s the case, look for this sector to go through a bit of growing pain over the next 2 years, with sustained profit growth unlikely to return until competition eases with some needed consolidation.

Bottom line: The latest results from 2 top education companies reflect stiff competition and lack of scalability that will lead to eroding profits for the next 2 years.

Related postings 相关文章:

Education Getting Lesson in Competition

New Oriental Results: Slowing Education Growth Story 新东方发表最新财报 中国教育服务增长减速?

Parade of China Money-Losers Report to Wall Street 多家中国企业亏损凸显市场竞争激烈

China Auto Wins 2012 Race For 1st US IPO 神州租车抢先成首个赴美IPO的中国企业

It’s official: the year for New York IPOs of Chinese firms has formally begun, and the first company out of the gate for 2012 is an unlikely candidate in the form of a rental car company with the rather boring name of China Auto. The company made its formal first public filing on Thursday in the United States for a New York initial public offering to raise up to $300 million, a respectable figure for a sector that has been dogged for nearly a year now by a series of accounting scandals that have hammered US-listed China stocks. (English article; Chinese article) China Auto included a wide range of data in its first public filing, but most of it was detailed information about its core car rental business and no mention was made of whether or not it is profitable. My guess would be that the company does indeed earn a profit, as any loss-making company would be foolish to try its luck as the first new Chinese company to list in New York this year in the highly skeptical climate towards such stocks. The year 2011 was one that most US-listed Chinese firms would rather forget, characterized by a series of accounting scandals that saw many companies plunge in value, often by 50 percent or more. Recent signs have emerged that the worst of the sell-off may be past (previous post), though the true test will come with the first new IPO by a Chinese company in the new year. Based on this initial filing, that company could well be China Auto. Significantly, China Auto comes from the auto rental space, making it a much more conventional company that investors can better understand, unlike the high-tech and Internet firms that make up the big majority of the largest US-listed China firms. China raced past the US to become the world’s largest auto market in 2010, as economic incentives from Beijing boosted demand from millions of new Chinese yuppies during the global downturn. Most of those incentives have now ended, causing sales to slow considerably, perhaps providing a golden opportunity for the car rental business that caters to people who would rather rent than own a car. I’ll need to see some more financials — specifically how profitable or loss-making China Auto is — before making a sharper prediction on how its IPO will fare if it goes forward. But given the preliminary data and broader market conditions, I would say the offering should attract moderate interest from investors and should help restore some confidence to the battered sector.

Bottom line: China Auto is likely to see moderate success from its pending US listing, helping to restore some confidence to the battered sector of US-listed China stocks.

Related postings 相关文章:

Cleanup Resumes, Facebook Sniffs Out China Investors 在美上市的中国企业将继续面临“大清洗”

Xunlei, Muddy Waters Sound Upbeat Notes 迅雷和Muddy Waters保持谨慎乐观

2011 Limps Out With Haitong IPO Withdrawal 海通证券推迟IPO 2011以市场疲弱状态落幕

AmEx Chases E-Payments With Lianlian Link 美国运通联手中国连连集团

It’s not often that I get to write about new initiatives by big foreign banks in China these days, so I’m taking this opportunity to take a quick look at a new and potentially intriguing deal involving American Express (NYSE: AXP) and Lianlian, a Chinese firm that helps mobile users add money to their accounts. Followers of big global banks like Citibank (NYSE: C), Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) and Royal Bank of Scotland (London: RBS) know that most of those names have spent the last few years trying to salvage their core operations at home, following the global financial crisis that saw most nearly driven to insolvency and only surviving with massive government bailouts. Against that backdrop, the only major activity we’ve seen from those banks in China in the last 3 years has been their sale of early stakes they took in China’s big 4 banks before they went public, with Bank of America and RBS both selling such stakes to raise cash. (previous post) Amid all the selling, American Express has been one of the few big foreign names to actually retain its share in a big Chinese bank, in this case holding on to a relatively small stake in ICBC (HKEx: 1398; Shanghai: 601398), China’s largest bank. Now AmEx says it is investing in Lianlian Group, a Chinese e-payments company founded in 2004 — making it a relatively mature 8 years old in this interesting and fast evolving space. (company announcement) AmEx isn’t saying how much it’s investing, and is careful to point out it has invested in an offshore unit of Lianlian, as China is still quite sensitive about direct foreign investments in the e-payments sector. The investment also looks like part of a broader tie-up that will see Lianlian use AmEx technology, specifically licensing an e-payment platform developed by the US financial services giant. I’ll admit this is the first time I’ve heard of Lianlian, which, according to the announcement, serves 300 million mobile users by offering services for them to add money to their accounts through a network of 300,000 agents across China. Those numbers are surely exaggerated somewhat, but even if the true figures are only half as big this certainly looks like a company to watch. Its combination of relatively long history, broad penetration and now this tie-up with AmEx seem to point to a name with strong prospects in a fast-growing area, with potential for an interesting IPO in the financial services space in the next 2 years.

Bottom line: E-payments firm Lianlian looks like a company to watch, following a new tie-up that includes a technology agreement and equity investment by American Express.

Related postings 相关文章:

Foreign Banks in China: A Love Affair Ends 外资银行撤资与中国同行说再见

Bank of China Considers Offshore I-Banking 中国银行考虑收购RBS投行资产

CITIC Securities, Koreans Challenge Western Giants 中信证券和韩国电视台挑战西方企业

BYD Gets Back to Basics

After a year of hyping its electric vehicle (EV) initiatives even as sales of its traditional cars plunged, BYD (HKEx: 1211; Shenzhen: 002594) is finally waking up to the reality that it needs to focus on the present as much as the future by trumpeting early success of some of its newest gasoline-powered vehicles. The company’s shares soared eightfold in 2009 after billionaire investor Warren Buffett bought a 10 percent stake, presumably betting on BYD’s big gamble on electric powered cars. But since then its fortunes have faded considerably, with the company’s sales of traditional cars tumbling about 15 percent last year due to lack of exciting new models even as the rest of the market eked out modest growth. In the process, BYD’s shares also took a beating, losing as much as three-quarters of their value last year before bouncing back a bit over the last 2 months. Some of that bounce-back is no doubt due to a broader year-end market rally, but perhaps some is also due to guarded optimism over early success that the company is trumpeting for recently launched SUV and high-end sedan models, where BYD is competing mostly with major foreign automakers. BYD says that its G6 high-end sedan launched 4 months ago zoomed to a strong but still relatively modest 5,100 units in December, and predicted 10,000 in monthly sales for the near future. (company announcement) It also said its self-developed SUV sold 15,000 units in December, as sales of the model that went on sale last spring also accelerated toward the end of the year. (company announcement) I do find it a bit ironic that a company that is betting its future on energy saving EVs is trying to salvage its present by focusing on gas guzzling vehicles like SUVs and high-end sedans. But that said, I do have to finally applaud BYD for waking up to the reality that it needs to develop a steady stream of traditional gasoline-burning vehicles to remain a healthy company over the next few years as it promotes its longer-term electric vehicles. These early sales figures for its SUV and high-end sedan look promising, though they are still relatively modest. But if the trends continue, look for BYD’s market share, and quite possibly its stock, to regain some of its previous luster in 2012.

Bottom line: BYD could gain back some of the market share it lost in 2011 fueled by new higher-end vehicles that are showing early strong sales.

Related postings 相关文章:

BYD’s New EV Plan: Hook Them With Investment 比亚迪拉美电动车之路堪忧

Cars: US, Germany Clobber Japan, Domestic Rivals 美德汽车在华完胜日本和中国车商

China Slams the Brakes on Automakers 中国为汽车行业踩刹车

Banks to Lend More, But to Whom? 银行获准增加放贷 但流向选择有限

Chinese banks are fast becoming a group of financial contradictions, rushing to implement the latest government financial directives even when doing so makes little or no commercial sense, once again spotlighting the big risk that investors take by buying into these companies. The latest twist in China’s ongoing banking saga has central planners suddenly loosening their grip on the nation’s lenders, which were under strict orders last year to curb their new loans to help Beijing cool an overheated economy. But following a GDP report earlier this week that saw growth slip to a 2 year low of 8.9 percent in the fourth quarter, central planners are deciding that perhaps banks should lend a little more to make sure the economy doesn’t cool too much. Separate media reports are saying that Beijing has suddenly decided that top banks, including names like ICBC (HKEx: 1389; Shanghai: 601398) and China Construction Bank (HKEx: 939; Shanghai: 601939), can increase their lending by up to 5 percent this quarter (English article), and that the banking regulator may also loosen capital requirements. (English article) Both of these moves are clearly designed to pump more money into the economy to spur growth, much the way Beijing did at the height of the global financial crisis when traditional economic engines like exports and foreign investment dropped off sharply. The only problem this time is that while Beijing has given the green light for banks to lend more, it isn’t giving them very many options about where they can make those new loans. Two of the biggest traditional sources of new loans, real estate mortgages and government infrastructure, both remain off-limits for banks, as Beijing tries to cool the overpriced home market and worries about the potential for massive defaults on a huge jump in loans made to local governments for new infrastructure during the global slowdown. Lending to small and medium sized enterprises also looks unlikely to grow much soon, as corporate lending by the big banks typically goes to big state-owned enterprises. With all those lending channels closed or inaccessible, one of the few remaining outlets is the stock market, as another major source of loans is for individuals and companies that use the funds to bet on the stock market. So we could potentially see the stock market get a lift from this latest Beijing banking directive, though that kind of boost hardly seems healthy or natural, and could lead to even more problems in the form of more bad loans if the stock market rally is short-lived.

Bottom line: China’s banks are fast becoming schizophrenic lenders intent on implementing Beijing’s latest directives, leading them to policies that make little or no commercial sense.

Related postings 相关文章:

2012: Capitial Raising II Year For China Banks 2012:中国银行业的又一个融资年

Ping An Returns to Market With Second Big Fund Request 中国平安拟发大规模可转债

Beijing’s Financial Shufflle: Bankers or Regulators? 中国金融高层“大换血”

 

Yang Departure Cuts Final Yahoo-Alibaba Ties 雅虎即将与阿里撇清关系

If Yahoo (Nasdaq: YHOO) was looking for a way to tell the world that its troubled relationship with Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group was nearing an end, then the just-announced resignation of Yahoo co-founder Jerry Yang from all his posts at both companies looks like the perfect and very appropriate signal. Yang’s resignation means he will relinquish his positions as a director on the boards of both Yahoo and Alibaba, marking a quiet end to a stormy chapter in both companies’ history. (English article) Yang and Alibaba founder Jack Ma made headlines in 2005 when they announced that Yahoo would buy 40 percent of Alibaba for $1 billion to create a potent partnership that would combine Alibaba’s expertise in e-commerce with Yahoo’s in online search. But it soon became clear that Jack Ma was more interested in Yahoo’s money than anything Yang or his company had to offer in terms of advice — a reality that was fine with both sides as Yang focused on trying to rebuild Yahoo’s core US-focused business as it rapidly lost share to a more nimble Google (Nasdaq: GOOG). All that changed when Yang resigned as Yahoo CEO and yielded the job to Carol Bartz, an executive whose aggressive style clashed with Ma’s own similar style and led to a prolonged period of tense relations between the 2 companies. Through all of that, Yang, who remained as a non-executive board member of Yahoo, continued to maintain personal ties with Alibaba, getting invitations and often attending the Chinese company’s Alifest big annual conference in its hometown of Hangzhou. Yang’s resignation from both the Alibaba and Yahoo boards comes just 2 weeks after Yahoo named Scott Thompson as its new CEO, filling the position that has been vacant since Bartz was fired last year. I suspect the departure was a condition when Thompson agreed to take the job, aimed at giving him a clear mandate to run the company with a fresh start. Alibaba and its bankers have been sending a nonstop series of signals to the market that they have raised enough money to buy out Yahoo’s 40 percent Alibaba stake, and Yang’s departure should remove the final reminder of the forces behind the original tie-up that can let this much-needed divorce finally go forward. When that happens, which could be in the next 2 months, I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see Yang suddenly appear in Alibaba, either as an investor or perhaps even an executive in one of the company’s units.

Bottom line: Jerry Yang’s resignation from the boards of Yahoo and Alibaba signal a pending divorce of the 2 companies, which could see Yang ultimately end up as an investor or executive at Alibaba.

Related postings 相关文章:

Yahoo, Alibaba Dance Nears Finale  雅虎应与阿里巴巴撇清干系

Alibaba Scrambles to Prove High Valuation 阿里巴巴高估值或将作茧自缚

Alibaba Tests Waters for Yahoo Buyout – Again 阿里巴巴再试水竞购雅虎股权

Disney Bets on China Thirst for Luxury 迪士尼押注中国名品市场

China’s thirst for luxury goods is a well established fact, with sales soaring for big brands like Louis Vuitton and Burberry in recent years as Chinese consumers eagerly spend thousands of dollars for the latest status symbol. But the taste for luxury for more everyday items is far less established — a reality that Disney (NYSE: DIS) will have to contend with as it embarks on an ambitious plan to open up to 40 of its recently developed Disney-brand stores in China over the next 3 years. (English article) Western firms have a very strong track record in China at the top-end of the luxury goods market, but things are decidedly more mixed at the middle-end where Disney will try to sell items like pricey clothing bearing Mickey and Minnie Mouse, and similarly expensive stuffed toys. Rival toymaker Mattel (NYSE: MAT) suffered an embarrassing setback in China last year when it shuttered its biggest House of Barbie in Shanghai, amid talk that Chinese were unwilling to shell out big bucks for the expensive toys and other kid-oriented services it was selling. (previous post) Likewise, Best Buy (NYSE: BBY), the world’s biggest electronics retailer, shuttered its own-brand stores in China last year after realizing consumers weren’t willing to pay a premium for its products in exchange for its big name and better service. (previous post) On the other hand, Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX) has found big success in China, using its premium image to get local yuppies to pay for lattes and cappuccinos that often cost twice as much as an entire meal at ordinary restaurants. Disney has a number of advantages over companies like Mattel, Best Buy and even Starbucks, in that its name is far more recognized in China than any of those other brands in China, with more than 20 years of history. Furthermore, this retail initiative is part of Disney’s much broader multi-faceted approach in China, which also includes selling its traditional TV shows and movies, licensing merchandise, opening Disney-branded English language schools and plans for a Disneyland in Shanghai. The big question is whether parents will be willing to pay such a large premium for toys and other Disney store merchandise for their kids, who are unlikely to notice the difference from lower-priced goods. But given Disney’s big name and popularity in China, I would say its new store initiative stands a good chance of success.

Bottom line: Disney’s new store initiative in China stands a good chance of success, drawing on the company’s strong brand awareness and premium image.

Related postings 相关文章:

Shanghai Support to Provide Welcome Tonic for Disney

Starbucks Goes Downmarket in China Drive 星巴克在华开拓低端市场

Welcome to the China Dollhouse: Barbie Packs Up Shanghai Camper

Ku6-YouTube Tie-Up: China Hype Alive and Well 酷6网和YouTube合作恐难成正果

I want to start today with a silly story that shows that despite the recent confidence crisis for US-listed Chinese stocks, anyone with a good China story to tell can still earn a fast buck on Wall Street. The story I’m referring to involves battered video sharing site Ku6 Media (Nasdaq: KUTV), which has announced a tie-up with YouTube that will see the global giant start a new channel to bring Ku6’s content to a global audience. (company announcement; Chinese article) The announcement contains no additional details, but that didn’t stop investors from getting excited enough over a good China story to boost Ku6’s Nasdaq-listed shares by a whopping 140 percent on Tuesday. Cynics like myself will note that even with the jump, Ku6 shares are still at less than half of their highs from last May, when a broader sell-off began for US-listed China stocks due to a series of accounting scandals. Let’s sit back and think about this new deal for a minute. Sure, YouTube is a huge name in online video and there are certainly plenty of people outside China who might be interested in watching more China-generated content. But nowhere in Ku6’s announcement is there any mention of exclusivity, and if this tie-up is even remotely successful I suspect YouTube will quickly start looking for more China partners with bigger content libraries, such as Youku (NYSE: YOKU) and Tudou (Nasdaq: TUDO), which undoubtedly would be happy to enter into such alliances. What’s more, Ku6 is a company with a bit of an identity crisis, having undergone a number of major changes in its management and strategic direction over the past year at the instigation of its fickle controlling shareholder, Shanda Interactive (Nasdaq: SNDA). In fact, I strongly suspect this new announcement is the work of Shanda founder and chairman Chen Tianqiao, who has proven himself a master at making headlines that sounds exciting but mostly lack substance. At the end of the day, I seriously doubt this new tie-up will rescue Ku6, although it could theoretically become a more attractive takeover target for one of its larger rivals. At the end of the day, all this just shows that western investors will always love a good China story, regardless of how much substance it has — or lacks.

Bottom line: A new tie-up between Ku6 and YouTube will bring minimal benefits to Ku6, but a huge jump  in Ku6 stock shows that western investors will always love an good China story.

Related postings 相关文章:

Ku6 Media Bulks Up, Heats Up Online Video 酷6扩张版图

Ku6 Media CEO Falls Victim to Whimsical Ways of Shanda’s Chen

Shanda’s New Deal: Spinning Off Literature 盛大文学拟分拆上市