Bottom line: Alibaba’s victory in a shareholder lawsuit is partly justified due to its pre-IPO disclosure that piracy is a major risk for the company, but it still should have disclosed a recent government report sharply criticizing it on the matter.
Alibaba triumphs in shareholder lawsuit
E-commerce giant Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) is a master at influencing public opinion through its own hype, but is far less successful with government officials who often view its aggressive ways with more skepticism. With that background in mind, the company’s new courtroom victory in a shareholder lawsuit looks like a refreshing nod of approval from a government source, setting it apart from the usual cheers from fans of the company’s stock. I would probably agree with that view, even though in this case I’m not sure I completely agree with the judge’s decision. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: A Beijing visit by Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella hints that a settlement will soon be announced in the 3-year-old anti-trust probe against the company, which could include a fine of more than $1 billion.
Microsoft’s Nadella back in China
Just weeks after Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) CEO Tim Cook came to China on a trip partly aimed at damage control, Microsoft’s (NYSE: MSFT) CEO Satya Nadella is in Beijing on a similar mission involving a long-running anti-trust probe against the world’s biggest software company. The trip, and the fact that it was probably leaked by Microsoft, hints that the nearly 3-year-old probe against the company is nearing completion and we could soon see China announce corrective action against the company. A similar series of events unfolded before last year’s anti-trust settlement of a similarly long Beijing probe against US telecoms chip giant Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM). Read Full Post…
Bottom line: China’s commerce regulator is putting growing pressure on Alibaba to play by its rules governing piracy and fair competition, but is likely to keep dialogue private to avoid public spats like one early this year.
SAIC accepts JD’s Alibaba complaint
E-commerce juggernaut Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) is coming uncomfortably under the microscope just days before its important Singles Day shopping extravaganza, with 2 new developments reflecting growing scrutiny from the nation’s top commerce regulator. The first has the powerful State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) formally accepting a complaint from rival JD.com (Nasdaq: JD), which accuses Alibaba of strong-arm tactics aimed at stifling competition during Singles Day promotions set for November 11.
The second headline looks a bit more benign, and simply says that SAIC Minister Zhang Mao visited Alibaba’s headquarters in the city of Hangzhou in coastal Zhejiang province this week. Headlines from that meeting look designed to show a facade of harmony, with Zhang praising Alibaba for its innovation in e-commerce. But I do suspect that Zhang is strongly pushing Alibaba behind the scenes to clean up its sites of traffic in pirated and substandard products, and also to avoid abusing its market dominance that led to the JD.com complaint. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: The latest spat between Alibaba and JD over behind-the-scenes strong-arm tactics will quickly subside following JD’s filing of a formal complaint, as both come under government pressure to clean up their sites of counterfeit goods.
JD accuses Alibaba of strong-arm tactics
In what’s quickly becoming an annual ritual of fall, a war of words has broken out between e-commerce leaders Alibaba(NYSE: BABA) and JD.com(Nasdaq: JD) in the run-up to China’s November 11 Singles Day, the world’s biggest online spending extravaganza. This year JD has accused its larger rival of pressuring third-party online merchants to limit their Singles Day promotions to Alibaba’s own websites, effectively freezing out other sites like JD’s where those same merchants may also operate other online stores.
At the same time, Alibaba, JD and their many smaller e-commerce peers are coming under fire from a new Beijing report saying that more than 40 percent of goods sold online in China are either fake or of poor quality. This new report looks similar to another one that came out early this year uncovering rampant piracy among Chinese e-commerce firms. This time no specific companies are named in the latest media reports. The report earlier this year named many specific companies, and cited Alibaba’s popular Taobao mall as one of the most egregious marketplaces for trade in counterfeit goods. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: A major US trade group’s new call for censure of Alibaba over piracy will bring more negative publicity, though the company’s name is unlikely to reappear on the next edition of Washington’s “notorious markets” list for trade in counterfeit goods.
Group says Taobao still plagued by fakes
A major US trade group that launched an assault on Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) earlier this year is ratcheting up the volume of its attack, calling for direct censure of the Chinese e-commerce giant for not doing enough to fight piracy. The American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA) was quite scathing in its earlier criticism of Alibaba back in July, blasting the company for its flawed approach and lack of transparency in tackling piracy on its Taobao C2C marketplace.
At the time of that critique the AAFA said it was sending a letter detailing its concerns to the US Trade Representative’s office, which compiles an annual list of “notorious markets” where piracy is rampant. Now the AAFA, which represents more than 1,000 American clothing and shoe makers, is being even more direct by specifically calling for Alibaba to be included on the next edition of the “notorious” list that is likely to be published in the next 2-3 months. (AAFA announcement; English article) Read Full Post…
Bottom line: Alibaba’s establishment of a dual headquarters in Beijing for its Tmall unit looks like a smart move to improve relations with government regulators, and should help to avoid future clashes over issues like piracy.
Alibaba’ss Tmall opens second HQ in Beijing
Embattled e-commerce giant Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) is finally realizing that only the passage of time will the ease the weight of negative sentiment dogging the company, and is moving on to the important business of laying a more solid foundation for its future development. That’s my interpretation based on the company’s latest major move, which has Alibaba’s Tmall online marketplace set to establish a second headquarters in Beijing.
Media have been buzzing with rumors about the move for much of this week, with some saying Tmall might be preparing to relocate its headquarters completely to Beijing from Alibaba’s hometown of Hangzhou. But the reputable China Business Network (CBN) says it has finally gotten to the bottom of the story, and that Alibaba’s intent is to have Tmall co-headquartered in both Beijing and Hangzhou. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: Alibaba will mount an intense campaign in Washington over the next 6 months in a bid to avoid major embarrassment if its name appears on a widely watched list of global Internet companies that don’t do enough to fight piracy.
Volume grows in Alibaba anti-piracy drive
Just weeks after hiring a major lobbyist to convince Washington it’s serious about fighting piracy, e-commerce leader Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) is turning up the volume in its campaign with a couple of new announcements about its commitment to combating the problem. The latest of those has seen Alibaba jointly issue an announcement with the Washington-based International AntiCounterfeiting Coalition, reaffirming an earlier tie-up aimed at stamping out the selling of fake products in Alibaba’s popular e-commerce marketplaces.
The other announcement came earlier in the week, and saw Alibaba announce it was strengthening its cooperation with a Chinese organization that fights online copyright infringement. Unfortunately for Alibaba, no one paid too much attention to these 2 announcements, with the result that its renewed anti-piracy blitz wasn’t publicized too much in mainstream media. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: Alibaba’s new hiring of a Washington insider to head its international government affairs reflects its attempts to look more global, and also an intense lobbying campaign to ensure its name stays off an annual US piracy list.
Alibaba bulks up in Washington
E-commerce giant Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) has just made a major new addition to its Washington lobbying team, as it gears up for what’s likely to become one of its biggest battles yet on Capitol Hill. That battle will see the company try to convince the Obama administration that it’s a strong partner in the battle against piracy, as it tries to stay off an annual list published by Washington that singles out major internet sites that don’t do enough to stamp out counterfeiting.
Alibaba’s new hire of former GE Capital executive Eric Pelletier to head its international government affairs is also part of its attempts to look more global by adding big-powered non-Chinese to its top management ranks. The move parallels similar hires by equally globally-minded companies including networking equipment giant Huawei and leading PC maker Lenovo (HKEx: 992), which are also trying to convince the world that they’re truly global players and not just Chinese companies. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: China’s largest corporations need to face stiffer regulatory penalties to ensure their compliance with Beijing rules, as part of a campaign to clean up the country’s business climate.
More strictness needed in Alibaba, telco cases
Some of China’s leading high-tech firms were in the headlines last week for foot-dragging in response to government calls to change their business practices, in separate cases that show why Beijing needs to get more aggressive about enforcing its rules among big domestic corporations.
The first case saw e-commerce giant Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) sued by one of the world’s top makers of luxury goods for allegedly refusing to clean up its popular sites of trafficking in pirated goods. The second saw critics accuse China’s 3 major mobile carriers of taking largely empty steps to improve their mobile data pricing and speeds, after Beijing called on them to take such action. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: A new anti-bribery probe against the medical device divisions at Siemens, GE and Philips will end with a quiet settlement, as China scales back a wave of probes that have raised complaints about discrimination against multinationals.
Foreign medical device makers fall under China microscope
Summer time is fast approaching, which means it’s time for China’s latest crackdown on foreign firms to start heating up. Such crackdowns are becoming an annual tradition, and have even developed a certain cyclicity that sees them begin in late spring, then reach a fever pitch in summer before fading in the fall. This year could continue that pattern, following reports that the medical device units of global conglomerates Siemens (Frankfurt: SEIGn), General Electric (NYSE: GE) and Philips (Amsterdam: PHG) are all being probed over whether they bribed hospitals and other medical professionals to achieve their current market dominance. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: China’s regulators should work closely with innovators like Alibaba and SMG to minimize the risk from their new financial products that bring small lenders and borrowers together.
Alibaba, SMG partner on film finance
E-commerce giant Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) made its latest advance in the financial realm last week, announcing a major tie-up with Shanghai’s leading broadcaster to promote film finance over its online platform based on the crowd-funding concept. The move extends Alibaba’s recent forays into both entertainment and finance, and could provide a major boost for smaller Chinese movie makers who often lack access to project funding.
But the reality is that movie making is a highly risky business for even the most experienced companies, and smaller productions are famous for losing money. That means many of the projects that get financed through the new Alibaba tie-up with Shanghai Media Group (SMG) may ultimately see investors lose some or all their money if and when poorly conceived projects fail to find an audience. Read Full Post…
