The following press releases and media reports about Chinese companies were carried on February 14. To view a full article or story, click on the link next to the headline.
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
◙ China Tells Banks to Roll Over Local Govt Loans: Report (English article)
◙ iPad Confiscated in China After Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) Trademark Legal Loss (English article)
◙ Kaixin001 2011 Revenue Up 41% (English article)
◙ Tencent (HKEx: 700) and EA (Nasdaq: EA) Bring The Sims Social to China (Businesswire)
◙ DuPont and Yingli Green Energy (Nasdaq: YGE) Enter $100 Million Strategic Agreement (PRNewswire)
◙ Latest calendar for Q1 earnings reports (Earnings calendar)
The ongoing legal tiff between Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) and a relatively obscure Taiwanese company over the rights to the iPad name in China has mesmerized the Chinese media and Apple fans in general, but what it really shows is how badly broken the Chinese legal system is when it comes to copyright and intellectual property (IP) protection. Instead of protecting companies like Apple, which are the innovators that drive technology, this series of Chinese lawsuits is doing just the opposite, with the Taiwanese company using China’s inept legal system to try and extort money from this global giant. What’s scarier, the Taiwanese company, an affiliate of Proview Technology, could very well win the case, forcing Apple to either pay an extortionate fee for the use of the iPad name in China, or potentially to abandon the name altogether in this important market. Surely this is not what trademark protection law was meant to do. Let’s quickly review the facts in this case to show why it’s become a bit of a farce, albeit a closely watched one. Apparently the Proview affiliate registered the iPad name back in 2001 when the Taiwan parent was developing a product that clearly had no relationship to Apple’s highly popular product of the same name launched in 2010. That Proview product was no doubt a dud, and the company later sold the global rights to the name to a British firm, which ended up selling the rights to Apple. So now it seems the Proview affiliate has discovered the transfer of the iPad name was never properly executed in China. But rather than admit its fault in the matter and complete the name transfer, it is actually suing Apple in China, saying it still owns the iPad name and Apple is violating its copyright. And rather than force the Proview affiliate to correct the situation, which is what would probably happen in any Western courtroom, the Chinese courts seem to be interpreting the law quite literally and saying that Proview still owns the iPad trademark, and that Apple therefore must either license the name again or stop using it. The case isn’t over yet, with hearings taking place in several Chinese courtrooms. But if China is smart, some senior judicial officials should quickly step in and talk with the judges involved and quickly end the case in Apple’s favor or with a reasonable settlement. Otherwise they risk tarnishing the image of a Chinese copyright protection system that, while headed in a positive direction, is still rife with problems.
Qihoo 360 (NYSE: QIHU) seems to pride itself in its ability to make headlines, usually by touting user numbers that some believe are highly inflated, and the latest events that have propelled this company onto the front page just underscore its highly controversial nature. Qihoo, better known for launching assaults on others, both in the courtroom and in the business arena, saw its applications abruptly removed from Apple’s (Nasdaq: AAPL) China app store, amid allegations of manipulation of the ratings information posted by buyers of its apps. (
The intense rivalry between Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) and Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) is heating up in China, with the former hosting a somewhat unruly launch of its latest iPhone 4S in Beijing and Shanghai as the latter prepares to launch an app store for competing smartphones using its Android operating system. Apple made headlines in China over the weekend after scuffles broke out at some of its stores when the iPhone 4S formally went on sale the day before under service contracts with China Unicom (HKEx: 762; NYSE: CHU), China’s second biggest mobile carrier and Apple’s only iPhone partner in China so far. The biggest scuffle occurred when one Beijing store decide not to open due to safety concerns after large crowds lined up overnight to buy the phones as soon as they went on sale. (
China’s 3 telcos are all in the news in this first week of the new year, with China Unicom (HKEx: 762; NYSE: CHU) making a long-awaited iPhone announcement, while an intriguing newly announced chip could give a big boost to China Mobile‘s (HKEx: 941; NYSE: CHL) 3G service. Last but not least, China Telecom (HKEx: 728; NYSE: CHA) has announced an interesting move abroad, with potentially more to come. Let’s start with Unicom, which after months of delay, will finally start selling Apple’s (Nasdaq: AAPL) newest iPhone 4S on January 13. (
