Cash-Rich China Eyes More Global Energy Assets  财大气粗的中国企业着眼更多全球资源并购

There are a few interesting items out today on the energy sector, spotlighting two recent trends that have seen China become a major player on the global M&A stage, while its energy majors also suffer from growing exposure to liability industrial from accidents. In the first category, Yanzhou Coal (HKEx: 1171; Shanghai: 600188; NYSE: YZC) and Sinopec (HKEx: 386; NYSE: SNP) are reportedly exploring major new deals in Australia and Spain; while in the second category oil producer CNOOC (HKEx: 883; NYSE: CEO), already embroiled in an environmental mess off the northeast China coast, is reporting more similar woes at one of its southern China operations. Let’s look at the latest M&A deals first, which are seeing Yanzhou make a $2 billion bid for Gloucester Coal (Sydney: GCLAX) (English article), while Sinopec is reportedly eyeing a 2.7 billion euro bid for 10 percent of Spanish oil major Respol, part of a bigger stake held by indebted Spanish developer Sacyr Vallehermoso. (English article) What both of these deals have in common is that the assets are being sold by owners under financial pressure to raise funds, a factor that will play to the advantage of Chinese firms that are not only cash rich, but also have easy access to credit due to Beijing’s desire to become more energy self sufficient. That combination of tight credit outside China and Beijing’s desire buy global assets should help to make 2012 a big year for Chinese acquisitions of global resource assets, especially as cash-strapped global companies look to sell such assets to raise quick funds. (previous post) Meantime, CNOOC has issued a press release saying one of its gas units in the southern city of Zhuhai near Macau has discovered a leak in one of its nearby offshore subsea gas pipelines. (company announcement) Following the discovery, CNOOC was forced to shutdown production of some wells, and, equally important, is incurring extra costs from emergency measures it is taking to avoid pollution, explosions and other accidents. This latest setback comes as the company faces billions of dollars in liability related to oil leaks at an oil field it is developing off the northeast China coast with ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP). The accidents spotlight the growing risk that CNOOC, Sinopec and other energy firms are facing as they expand both inside and outside China, and as Beijing puts growing importance on workplace safety and environmental protection.

Bottom line: New developments indicate 2012 will be a big year for global M&A by China energy firms, which will also face growing risk from industrial accidents.

Related postings 相关文章:

2012: The Year of China Resource M&A? 2012:中国企业的资源并购年?

Sinopec Latest Victim of Environmental Scrutiny 中石化管道工程因环保计划不足被叫停

Yanzhou’s War Chest Gets Fatter on New M&A Model 兖州煤业将为中国同行树立榜样

Microblog Clampdown: Only Chapter 1? 实名制向网络行业吹去冷风

A new rule requiring microbloggers to register using their real names continues to send chills through the online world, with a new report saying the campaign will soon be extended to other social media. The domestic media reports cite an unnamed government official in Beijing, which announced the initial rule late last week (previous post), saying more guidelines will follow requiring all sites to implement real-name registration throughout their various social networking sites to give operators like Sina (Nasdaq: SINA), Tencent (HKEx: 700) and Renren (NYSE: REN) quick and easy access to who is doing what and pass that information to government officials upon request. (English article) If China was looking to kill or severely stifle development of its fledgling but vibrant social media, this certainly looks like a good way to do it. The initial rule appeared to target microblogging sites, which would have dealt a blow to a limited number of companies, most notably Sina’s popular Weibo service. But this new expanded rule would potentially affect any and every kind of social media service, from microblogging to social networking services (SNS) operated by Renren and Kaixin and even instant messaging services like Tencent’s popular QQ. The traditional SNS services may be best positioned to weather this storm, as most encourage their users to register using their real names, whereas the big majority of microblogging and instant messaging users use Internet names that are often difficult or impossible to trace. But regardless of any of that, this expanded requirement will send a strong signal that anything and everything a person writes in any of these sites is being monitored by the government, discouraging many from using the services at all. In some ways, this latest crackdown looks similar to one 5 or 6 years ago on the then-vibrant text messaging services industry, a mainstay of Sina, Sohu and NetEase (Nasdaq: NTES) at that time. That crackdown effectively killed the industry in the years that followed. I doubt results of this crackdown will be as severe, but I would still look for activity on these social media sites to slow and even drop off sharply in the next year.

Bottom line: Beijing’s potential expansion of its real-name policy to all social media will send a chill through the industry and severely hamper its development.

Related postings 相关文章:

New Rule Hits Sina, Instant Messaging to Benefit? 微博实名重创新浪 即时信息服务有望受益

Govt’s Microblog Shift Looks Good for Weibo 政府口风转变或有利於新浪微博

Weibo Still Faces Crackdown Despite Govt Tie-Up 新浪微博难改“被监管”命运

New Loan Brings Alibaba Value Into Focus

New figures coming out of a foreign media report are starting to shed some light on the value Alibaba, China’s biggest e-commerce group, as it moves forward with a deal that would see it lead a group to buy out faded Internet giant Yahoo (Nasdaq: YHOO) and then personally buy back the 40 percent of itself that Yahoo current holds. The interesting element to all this is that based on the latest numbers, Alibaba’s valuation is likely to come in around $20 billion, not bad for a company whose only listed unit, B2B specialist Alibaba.com (HKEx: 1688) is only worth about $5 billion, but also a far cry from the $32 billion that some would like others to believe. According to the latest report, Alibaba is close to assembling a $4 billion loan that it would use to buy back the 40 percent of itself held by Yahoo after the bigger Yahoo buyout, which itself would be valued at around $25 billion. (English article) We already know from public data that Yahoo’s other big Asia asset, its 35 percent stake in Yahoo Japan (Tokyo: 4689), is worth about $6 billion at current market rates. That means $19 billion of the $25 billion purchase price would cover Yahoo itself and the 40 percent of Alibaba that it owns. We also know that Alibaba is raising $4 billion in bank loans to buy out the 40 percent of itself owned by Yahoo, which presumably represents perhaps about half of the financing for the deal. So that would mean Alibaba may pay about $8 billion for the 40 percent stake in the end, valuing itself at about $20 billion and the rest of Yahoo at about $11 billion. I know that may look like a lot of math, but at the end of the day we’re looking at 3 big pieces: A new Yahoo worth about $11 billion, an Alibaba worth about $20 billion and a Yahoo Japan which we already know is worth $18 billion. The Alibaba figure is the most interesting to me, as one of the company’s newest investors previously said the price his company paid for a stake in Alibaba this summer valued the group at $32 billion (previous post) I said that figure looked quite inflated and was indicative of China’s looming Internet bubble, which is already showing signs of bursting. Alibaba certainly realizes all this, which is why it is working hard to quickly close this deal and maintain a respectable valuation in the $20 billion range before the bubble really bursts.

Bottom line: The latest figures on a pending deal to buyout Yahoo show Alibaba is worth about $20 billion, a respectable sum but still well below a figure floated in the market earlier this year.

Related postings 相关文章:

Alibaba Scrambles to Prove High Valuation 阿里巴巴高估值或将作茧自缚

Alibaba Tests Waters for Yahoo Buyout – Again 阿里巴巴再试水竞购雅虎股权

Alibaba’s Incredible Shrinking Profit Growth 阿里巴巴盈利呈加速放缓趋势

Sinopec Balks at Rebuff to Hostile M&A Bid 中石化试水敌意收购碰壁

I’ve been watching with interest this week as the acquisition-hungry Sinopec (HKEx: 386; NYSE: SNP) made what many are saying was the first major attempt at hostile M&A by a Chinese company, only to become flustered when it was rebuffed. The rapid development of events shows that major Chinese companies are still neophytes in hostile takeovers, though this case would also indicate that they want to try more of this difficult form of deal making going forward as they look for strategic assets to build up their businesses. To recap, Sinopec surprised the markets earlier this week when it paired with ENN Energy (HKEx: 2688) to launch a $2.2 billion unsolicited bid for privately held China Gas (HKEx: 384), which operates a lucrative natural gas distribution network in China. China Gas fired back that the bid was too low, in a sharp rebuff that Sinopec and ENN clearly weren’t expecting. In the latest development, Sinopec’s chairman has said that now is “not the time” to consider a higher bid, indicating the company is unlikely to make a higher unsolicited offer in the near future. (English article)  Frankly speaking, I’m not surprised at the outcome for this first major effort at hostile M&A by a Chinese company. We need to guess a lot as clearly none of the parties are talking, but it doesn’t appear that Sinopec or ENN attempted a friendly takeover before making their hostile bid — a highly unusual occurrence in the world of M&A where the friendly route is always preferred to the hostile one. It also appears that Sinopec and ENN were completely unprepared for the rebuff they received, which again comes as a surprise as hostile offers are almost never accepted and anyone making such a bid usually has a back-up plan prepared that includes a higher bid or more detailed explanation of its actions if and when its original plan is rejected. The rapid developments in this case probably reflect a lack of experience by China’s big state-run firms in hostile M&A, and I suspect we may see Sinopec and ENN quietly enter direct negotiations with China Gas in the next few weeks, which could ultimately result in a deal more to China Gas’ liking. Regardless of the outcome in this case, Chinese firms are likely to see more stumbles in the years ahead as they try to become major global players in both friendly and hostile M&A.

Bottom line: The rapid collapse of Sinopec’s hostile offer for China Gas reflects the former’s inexperience at hostile M&A, and a friendly takeover could come instead in the next few months.

Related postings 相关文章:

2012: The Year of China Resource M&A? 2012:中国企业的资源并购年?

Pricey M&A, Cheaper Gas Undermine Sinopec 溢价收购和成品油降价 中石化面对双重利空

Sinopec Latest Victim of Environmental Scrutiny 中石化管道工程因环保计划不足被叫停

Acer Seeks Turnaround in Simplification

Taiwan’s Acer (Taipei: 2353), the former PC high-flyer that has fallen on hard times lately, is launching a new plan to revive its fortunes by aiming to reduce its bloated product line by around two-thirds, a move aimed at helping the company clean up house and recapture the innovation that made it a strong contender in the first place. Local media are quoting Acer Chairman J.T. Wang saying the company will review all of its products and weed out the many money losers over the next 3 years. (Chinese article)  This looks like an important first step to cleaning up a company whose rise to prominence began about a decade ago when it bet correctly on the future of laptop computers, putting a major effort into developing that part of the business. But over the last 3-4 years, Acer started to lose its way, becoming more of a follower than a leader by jumping on all of the latest industry trends, including netbooks, cellphones and most recently tablet PCs. I suspect that many of these business lines are doing poorly due to stiff competition and Acer’s late arrival to many of these products. Accordingly, Acer’s first step to restoring its fortunes should be a thorough review of all of these businesses and elimination of most or all of the unprofitable ones, which is what Wang seems to be proposing. But that kind clean-up should be just half of a two-pronged strategy that the company will need to reverse its tumble. The other prong, of course, is to regain some of the innovative energy that made it a leader in the notebook space for a solid period of 5 or 6 years as that business boomed. Cleaning up a cluttered product line will be relatively easy compared to becoming more innovative, as the latter is clearly key to sustained success and only a very small number of companies have shown the ability to keep creating popular new products over an extended period of time. That said, I applaud Acer for this new product cleanup, and would expect to see some innovative new products coming out of its catalog in the mid- to longer-term if it really wants to complete a turnaround.

Bottom line: Acer’s new plan to reduce its product line by 2/3 is an important first step to its turnaround, but it also needs to innovate with popular new products to complete the effort.

Related postings 相关文章:

Acer Trips, Lenovo Next? 联想应避免重蹈宏基覆辙

Acer: A Bumpy Road Ahead 宏碁:前路坎坷

China Takes Global PC Crown – But Does It Matter? 中国PC出货全球居冠 但有何意义?

Beijing Boosts Solar In Latest Mixed Signal 中国扩张太阳能行业发展 解决与美争端立场混乱

China really needs to hire someone to advise it on its solar energy policy, as new  reports that it will sharply boost its already aggressive program to build new solar power plants is just the latest in a steady string of mixed signals from Beijing amid a looming trade war with Washington. In this latest solar twist, China has reportedly boosted its target for new solar energy generation to 15 gigawatts by 2015, up from a previous target of 10 megawatts that was already considered aggressive. (English article) I’ve said previously that China needs to do more to promote its vibrant stable of solar panel makers, which it has carefully cultivated over the last 5 years and which now account for more than half of the world’s output. To that end, this latest announcement is good news and will undoubtedly be welcome by a battered sector now going through its worst-ever downturn. Reaction to the news was muted on Wall Street, probably because investors are more worried about imminent punitive tariffs that Washington is likely to slap on Chinese solar cells early next year in response to an unfair trade complaint by a group of US solar panel makers. Beijing’s response to the complaint has been all over the map, reflecting a lack of coordination that is hurting chances of resolving this dispute before it does some serious damage to an industry that not only has strong commercial potential but is also of vital interest to major energy consuming nations like the US and China. Beijing’s responses since the dispute broke out have ranged from outrage, with vehement denial of the allegations (previous post); to defiance, with the announcement of its own investigation into dumping by US firms (previous post); to apparent indifference, as it continued to openly support its solar cell makers by giving them the kind of preferential credit that was the source of the original US complaint. (previous post) This latest signal, while probably welcome by Chinese solar panel makers, is just the latest mixed signal. If I were advising Beijing, I would suggest it hire a PR consultant to help it send a message that is at once firm but also conciliatory, showing it doesn’t believe the US allegations but wants to resolve the dispute before it spins out of control and causes serious harm.

Bottom line: China’s new move to boost its use of solar energy is the latest in a string of mixed signals from Beijing, which needs to simplify its message to resolve a trade dispute with the US.

Related postings 相关文章:

China Rescues LDK With New Financing 中国拯救赛维LDK举动与未提供不公补贴说法相左

China Retaliates With Own US Solar Probe 中国启动对美可再生能源补贴调查

Beijing, Yingli Send Mixed Solar Signals 英利和中国政府似乎“背道而驰”

 

Bristol-Myers, EMC Tap China Priorities With New Tie-Ups  趁中国政策导向东风 百时美施贵宝与EMC联姻本土企业

A couple of new tie-ups involving major foreign players in pharmaceuticals and computing provide an interesting glimpse at how multinationals are trying to target their China initiatives to be in sync with Beijing’s latest policy agendas. The strategy of working with a local partner isn’t all that new, but in this case what’s more interesting is the targeted approach these two new tie-ups are taking, the first aimed at taking advantage of China’s ongoing massive overhaul of its healthcare system and the second at Beijing’s push to become a leader in cloud computing. Let’s look at the pharmaceuticals deal first, which is seeing Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY) teaming up with local drugmaker Simcere Pharmaceutical (NYSE: SCR) to make and sell a cardiovascular compound in China. (company announcement) The compound was developed by Bristol-Meyers Squibb, but Simcere will make and sell the drug in China, drawing on its strong connections to local regulators and other health care officials. This kind of deal is smart as it gives Bristol-Myers exposure to a coming boom for quality medicines as Beijing signs a series of multimillion-dollar deals to make those drugs available under its ongoing overhaul to make basic healthcare affordable for everyone. The second deal will see faded PC firm Great Wall Computer form a cloud computing joint venture with EMC (NYSE: EMC), the world’s biggest maker of data storage devices. (Chinese article) China has repeatedly said that cloud computing will be a major focus for development in the next few years, prompting a wide range of players to get in on the action, including Huawei and Alibaba. I see no reason why a big western name like EMC should try to get a piece of the action, and indeed, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) made a similar move last month with its own China-based R&D initiative in the space. (previous post) My only cause for concern with EMC is that Great Wall is hardly a big name in China anymore, and it also has a strong legacy as a state-run company, meaning it might not be the best partner for this kind of venture that calls for a more entrepreneurial approach. But that said, at least I have to credit EMC for being foresighted enough to get into this space while it’s still in the formative stages in China.

Bottom line: New China tie-ups between Bristol Myers-Squibb and EMC with partners in their respective sectors look like smart moves to take advantage of Beijing’s latest development priorities.

Related postings 相关文章:

Microsoft Looks for Place in China Cloud 微软投身中国云计算大潮

Merck Finds Potent China Partner in Simcere 默克牵手先声药业

Growth-Addicted Huawei Looks to the Cloud 华为渴求增长上瘾 着眼云计算

US, China in Auto Tit-For-Tat Tariffs 中美贸易战若升级将两败俱伤

In what should come as a big surprise to no one, China has singled out cars imported from the US for special duties after the US took similar action against Chinese-made tires in response to an anti-dumping complaint. This kind of tit-for-tat punitive tariff is relatively common and usually doesn’t do much damage as the amount of product affected is small, but in this case it provides some sobering insight over what could happen if another looming trade war involving solar cells escalates. In this latest instance, China will slap extra duties of up to 13 percent on US-made cars from GM (NYSE: GM) and Chrysler, and will even impose smaller punitive duties on cars made in the US by German auto makers like BMW (Frankfurt: BMW) and Daimler (Frankfurt: DAI). (English article) The move seems mostly symbolic, as the top 2 US automakers, GM and Ford (NYSE: F), already manufacture most of their models for the China market in China through their various joint ventures. Both the US and China are usually careful to keep these kinds of trade wars from getting out of control and affecting their broader economic relation, but a looming battle over alternate energy could soon test that formula, with the potential to blow up into a much bigger war that could deal a sharp setback to the drive to develop clean, renewable energy sources. Regular readers will know that of course I’m talking about the US investigation into unfair subsidies for Chinese solar cell makers, which now account for more than half of the world’s output, due in part to strong support from Beijing. A group advising the US body conducting the investigation has already determined that Beijing unfairly subsidizes its solar panel makers and recommended the levying of punitive tariffs, which are likely to come sometime early next year. Beijing has already hinted that it could retaliate with its own punitive tariffs for US-made polysilicon, the main ingredient used to make solar cells. That kind of escalation will ultimately benefit no one, either in the US or China, and could even deal a huge setback to a global solar industry already struggling through a sharp downturn.

Bottom line: China’s punitive levies against US cars looks like a retaliatory move for similar tariffs by the US against Chinese tires, and is unlikely to have any major impact on US automakers’ China sales.

Related postings 相关文章:

China Autos Set for Long Slowdown

Foreign Spending Spree Augers Woes for China Car Makers 外国车企大举投资中国 本土车企倍感压力

China Retaliates With Own US Solar Probe 中国启动对美可再生能源补贴调查

Soufun Looks For More Support With New Dividend 搜房网借新派息计划寻求支撑股价

When does a 31 percent dip in your share price look good? When your rivals’ share prices have fallen by even more, or at least that seems to be the thinking at real estate services firm Soufun (NYSE: SFUN), which has just announced its second dividend in the last 4 months amid a broader sell-off that has seen many US-listed China stocks tumble by even more in the last few months. Soufun’s latest plan looks even more attractive now than the first plan announced in August (previous post), as the payout amount will remain at $1 per American Depositary Share, translating to a return of about 7.5 percent based on the company’s latest share price. (company announcement) That’s up from a payout ratio of about 5 percent for the August dividend, when the company’s shares were quite a bit higher. A growing number of US-listed companies have tried the dividend approach, including chipmaker Spreadtrum (Nasdaq: SPRD) and online game specialists Giant Interactive (NYSE: GA) and most recentlly Shanda Games (Nasdaq: GAME), betting that cash payouts will appeal more to investors than traditional share buybacks. So how effective is the dividend strategy? A quick comparison shows that while Soufun’s shares are down 31 percent since it announced its first dividend, its closest rival, E-House (NYSE: EJ) is down by an even bigger 42 percent over the same period, showing the strategy may have some effect. Of course, Soufun’s recent posting of solid third-quarter results, even in the face of China’s rapid real estate slowdown, may also be helping its stock. (previous post) For all of those reasons, Soufun may indeed look like a nice play going forward. Dividends may be good for short-term investors, helping to support stock prices and provide some definite returns in uncertain markets. But for longer term investors, there’s still no replacement for solid company fundamentals and growth prospects, meaning it still pays to check a company’s bottom line no matter how nice the dividend.

Bottom line: The dividend approach being tried by many US-listed China firms is providing some short-term support for share prices and quick returns for investors.

Related postings 相关文章:

Shanda Plays Games With Big Dividend 盛大游戏寄望高额分红计划提振股价

Investors Pocket Spreadtrum, Giant Dividends and Run

Sofun’s New Strategy: Dividend Wave Ahead? 搜房网新策略:中国概念股派息潮即将来临?

2011: China Unicom’s Lost Year 中国联通失落的一年

Early this year I predicted that 2011 would be a breakthrough year for China Unicom (HKEx: 762; NYSE: CHU) (previous post), as it capitalized on its superior 3G technology and status as Apple’s (Nasdaq: AAPL) only official partner in China to take market share from its rivals. But as we head into the new year, history is much more likely to dub 2011 a year of lost opportunities for China’s perennial No 2 mobile carrier. What’s worse, 2012 doesn’t look much better, with Unicom on the cusp of losing its position as China’s second biggest player in the critical 3G market to more aggressive and better organized rival China Telecom (HKEx: 728; CHA). The latest signs of disarray at Unicom crop up almost daily, as the company seems to never have fully recovered from a major merger nearly 3 years ago that led to its current form. Chinese media are now reporting that Unicom is in the midst of its latest shakeup of top management at many of its biggest provincial subsidiaries, though even that process appears to be riddled with problems. (Chinese article) This shakeup has been going on since at least the middle of the year (previous post), and is obviously a huge distraction for the company which instead should have been focused on using its superior technology and Apple relationship to build up its 3G business. As a result of the internal chaos, the company’s 3G market share has held steady at around 30 percent all year, even as industry leader China Mobile (HKEx: 941; NYSE: CHL) has lost steady share in this critical new area to China Telecom, whose share has risen from about 24 early this year to 28 now. At this rate China Telecom will probably pass Unicom as the second biggest 3G carrier by next February or March. Reflecting just how inept Unicom has become, Chinese media are reporting that the company has only just now announced it will offer the latest Apple iPhone, the 4S, by January, months after its global roll-out. (English article) No reason was given for the delay, but previous reports have indicated Unicom was slow to get Apple’s latest hot product tested for compatibility with its system. And in one final show of incompetence to end the year, Chinese media are reporting Unicom won’t even offer the 3G version of the popular iPad 2 tablet PC due to weak sales for the non-3G iPad 2 in China. (Chinese article) This company sorely needs to get itself straightened out, or face a potentially disastrous 2012.

Bottom line: China Unicom has seen a steady stream of lost opportunities in 2011, and its slide is likely to continue next year as it loses the No 2 spot to China Telecom in the important 3G market.

Related postings 相关文章:

Sputtering Unicom’s Latest Excuse: Lack of Leadership

◙  Unicom’s Sputtering 3G: Blame It On the Handsets 联通幡然醒悟 借低价手机扩张3G市场

Unicom, China Telecom in iPhone 4S 中国电信有望领先推出iPhone 4S Race

2011 Limps Out With Haitong IPO Withdrawal 海通证券推迟IPO 2011以市场疲弱状态落幕

2011 could well go down as one of the most schizophrenic years for IPOs in recent memory, with the latest pulling of a mega-offering by Haitong Securities (Shanghai: 600837) symbolizing the dismal sentiment that has set in over the last 6 months after a strong start to the year. According to foreign media reports, Haitong, which is already listed in Shanghai, has decided to scrap its Hong Kong offering that would have seen it raise up to $1.7 billion due to dismal market sentiment. The decision comes after a steady string of other deals that were either scrapped or went forward with weak results. One of the biggest, a Hong Kong offering by Haitong rival CITIC Securities (HKEx: 6030; Shanghai: 600030) had to be scaled back but still went ahead despite the weak sentiment. Since then, the company’s shares have sunk about 3 percent from their IPO price in September, despite its premier status as China’s biggest brokerage. Other smaller offerings by online video site Xunlei and Shanda‘s (Nasdaq: SNDA) online literature unit Cloudary had to be were pulled as well, again due to weak investor sentiment. These smaller US companies have been hit not only by that weak broader sentiment, but also by more specific concerns about Chinese firms’ accounting practices following a series of accounting scandals earlier in the year. Companies that have gone forward with offerings this year have hardly offered any reassurance. Shares of Renren (NYSE: RENN), a leading Chinese social networking site, now trade at about a quarter of their IPO price since their May offering; while shares of video sharing site Tudou (Nasdaq: TUDO), which made its IPO in August when sentiment was already weak, have sunk by more than half from their IPO price even after the company reported a surprise third-quarter profit. The combination of confidence crisis and broader weak market sentiment is no doubt behind the huge losses for US-listed China stocks. That said, investor sentiment is notoriously cyclical, and I would expect people to rediscover the big potential of China stocks sometime next year, probably around the second quarter, at which time we should see names like Haitong and perhaps even Cloudary or Xunlei make a second try at an IPO. In the meantime, braver investors with money to spare could position themselves for some nice returns by buying shares now ahead of the next uptick.

Bottom line: Haitong Securities’ pulling of its IPO reflects a dismal IPO environment that should be near bottom, with sentiment likely to pick up for China plays around the second quarter of 2012.

Related postings 相关文章:

Internet Investors Seek Refuge in Big Names 互联网投资者选择性支持中国市场领头羊

Shanda Moves Ahead With Privatization 投资者对盛大私有化仍持保留态度

Year End Brings Problematic New IPO Wave 中国新一波IPO潮或无法达预期效果