Leading e-commerce site 360Buy is increasingly looking like a schizophrenic company in terms of its IPO plans, a troublesome development that may reflect a growing rift between its charismatic chief executive and some of its deep-pocketed investors who last year gave it a record $1 billion-plus in new capital. Founder Liu Qiangdong has been quite adamant that an IPO is off the table until next year at the earliest, as he works to build his company into one that would be truly attractive to investors by bringing in seasoned top-level managers and earning profits — 2 things it currently lacks. But then other reports keep popping up saying the company, which also goes by the name Jingdong Mall, is quickly moving towards an IPO to raise billions of dollars, including some high-profile reports last year to that effect. (previous post) Now, just days after the company’s latest denial of any imminent IPO, media are once again reporting that 360Buy is hiring investment banks to underwrite its offering, in the latest sign of dysfunction behind the scenes. (Chinese article) The latest reports seem to have some credibility, as they contain some financial figures that 360Buy reportedly gave to investment banks as it shops for underwriters, including its revenue and profit margins, as well as its net loss and estimates of when it will become profitable. Those results reportedly showed the company’s transaction volume reached $3.4 billion, falling well short of a previous target of $4.3 billion amid stiff competition in China’s overheated e-commerce sector. The reports contain some other figures, but what’s more interesting to me is the infighting that appears to be going on behind the scenes as reflected by the conflicting IPO messages. My interpretation is that Liu wants to take a cautious approach by waiting until his company either turns profitable or sees profits in close range before making the offering. That seems smart, considering that investors have been punishing shares of money-losing Internet companies that have made public offerings over the last 2 years. In the most recent of those, shares of discount online retailer Vipshop (NYSE: VIPS) plunged 15 percent last week when it became China’s first web firm to make an IPO in more than half a year amid weak market sentiment. (previous post) Its shares have fallen further since then, and are now 30 percent below their IPO price. While Liu wants to take the prudent approach, I suspect that investors who made the massive investment last year, including Russia’s Digital Sky Entertainment, are getting worried about the company’s future as China’s e-commerce market gears up for a major correction, and are pushing for an IPO much sooner to recoup some of their money. If this is the case, look for a tug-of-war to continue into the months ahead, potentially forcing 360Buy into a premature IPO that could meet with weak investor demand and a poor trading debut if it happens this year.
Bottom line: Conflicting signs from 360Buy indicate a growing difference of views between its top manager and major investors over the timing of an IPO.
Related postings 相关文章:
◙ E-Commerce: 360Buy Awaits IPO Window, Amazon Expands 京东IPO融资心切 亚马逊物流扩张加剧竞争
I’m feeling slightly artistic this morning, hence my choice of headline for this posting which is a reference to the famous Samuel Beckett play “Waiting for Godot,” about 2 people excitedly waiting for a person who will probably never appear. The same story could be true for ZTE (HKEx: 763; Shenzhen: 000063), whose just-released results showed plunging profits and rapidly rising costs as the company takes a risky bet on the low-cost smartphone market that may bring in lots of new revenue but never pay any returns in the form of new profits. (
The smoldering crisis quietly seeping through China’s financial services sector has infected the nation’s largest insurer, China Life (HKEx: 2628; Shanghai: 601628), which has announced plans to raise about $6 billion this year through the issue of subordinated debt, becoming the latest player to turn to financial markets to raise billions of dollars in new cash as provisions for shaky investments. (
Faced with a slowing home market and stiff competition from foreign-backed rivals, China’s big domestic auto brands are increasingly looking to developing markets to revive their flagging sales, with Geely (HKEx: 175) the latest to jump on the export bandwagon. A company executive says Geely, which made headlines a couple of years ago with its purchase of Volvo, aims to overtake domestic rival Chery in the next 2 years to become China’s leading car exporter. (
There are several interesting items out there today on US-listed Chinese firms, led by a resounding investor yawn at news that telecoms software maker and acquisition target AsiaInfo-Linkage (Nasdaq: ASIA) is seeking more offers after a major Chinese investor made a surprise bid for the company last month. In separate but other noteworthy news, we’re getting some more financials that don’t look pretty from car rental specialist China Auto, which has filed to make a New York IPO, and are hearing about an ambitious global expansion plan from e-commerce giant 360Buy, which hopes to someday make a New York IPO to raise more than $1 billion. Let’s start with AsiaInfo-Linkage, which put out a statement on Monday saying it was seeking additional buyers after receiving an offer in February from an investment arm of China’s giant CITIC Group. (
I don’t usually write about China’s airlines as I don’t think the industry is very exciting as a growth story; but as a Shanghai resident I just had to comment on the big new announcement by my hometown carrier China Eastern (HKEx: 670; Shanghai: 600115; NYSE: CEA), which is forming a budget airline joint venture with Australia’s Quantas (Sydney: QAN). To put it bluntly, I would warn investors that this new venture is destined for major turbulence, if it ever even gets off the ground. Under the tie-up, the 2 sides will form a new airline under Quantas’ JetStar low-cost brand to be based in Hong Kong. (
China’s export superstars Huawei and ZTE (HKEx: 763; Shenzhen: 000063) continue to face new obstacles in their quest for global legitimacy, with the former receiving a major setback in Australia as the latter comes under fire for dealings in the problematic Iranian market. Those developments reflect the uphill battle that both companies face in the eyes of western leaders, many of whom believe the these 2 telecoms equipment giants are little more than spying arms of Beijing. In the latest of a steady stream of setbacks for Huawei, Australia has officially disqualified the company from bidding for contracts to build a new $38 billion high-speed broadband network over security concerns. (
China’s banking sector may be heading into winter (