News Digest: February 15, 2012 报摘: 2012年2月15日

The following press releases and media reports about Chinese companies were carried on February 15. To view a full article or story, click on the link next to the headline.

══════════════════════════════════════════════════════

HP’s (NYSE: HPQ) China PC Market Share Drops to 5.3% (English article)

Renren (NYSE: RENN) Updates Preliminary Q4 Results and Q4 Earnings Date (PRNewswire)

ZTE (HKEx: 763) Announces Progress of Material Litigation With Ericsson (HKEx announcement)

Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) Removes iPad From China Site, GOME, 360Buy Still Selling (Chinese article)

Yahoo (Nasdaq: YHOO)-Alibaba Talks At An Impasse: Sources (English article)

◙ Latest calendar for Q1 earnings reports (Earnings calendar)

iPads: An Endangered Species in China? 中国高级司法官员应介入iPad商标权纠纷

Media are buzzing over new reports that iPads may suddenly be disappearing from Chinese store shelves following a court ruling against Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) in a trademark dispute, a sign of the turmoil and negative publicity that could be looming if China fails to deal with this situation quickly and transparently. The latest reports say that sellers of Apple products in some places have actually had their iPads confiscated, while many are starting to hide their iPads to avoid potential future confiscations depending on how the case develops. (English article; Chinese article) Apple watchers in China will know the case in question involves the iPad trademark, which was officially registered about a decade ago by an affiliate of a Taiwanese computer maker named Proview. Proview later sold the global rights to the name to a British company, which then sold the rights to Apple for a modest fee prior to the iPad’s global launch. The only problem, it turns out, is that the formal transfer of the iPad name in China was never officially completed, with the result that the Proview affiliate still technically owns the trademark in China. (previous post) Clearly the failure to complete the transfer was a technical mistake, and I can’t really comment on whether it was the fault of the Proview affiliate or the Chinese government agency in charge of trademarks. But regardless of who is to blame, rather than admit a mistake was made and trying to fix it, the Proview affiliate is now trying to blackmail Apple into paying a big fee for the China trademark again, and a Chinese court in Shenzhen has ruled in its favor, meaning Apple may officially be in violation of Chinese trademark law by selling its computers under the iPad name in China. One Chinese media report says the government is currently deliberating what to do about this case, and I’ve previously said that higher court officials should step in quickly and mediate this case in a fair and transparent way before it spins out of control and seriously tarnishes the reputation of China’s court systems. This latest wave of marketplace panic that is seeing vendors hide their product for fear of confiscation is exactly the kind of chaos that needs to be avoided, and I’ll repeat my call here once more for high-level judiciary officials to intervene and settle this dispute that is causing major waves despite being largely based on a technicality.

Bottom line: Chinese judicial officials need to quickly step in and mediate a fair solution to a dispute involving the iPad trademark, or risk seeing chaos and confusion emerge in the market.

Related postings 相关文章:

Apple vs Proview: China Legal System Still Broken 苹果与唯冠iPad商标权之争或损及中国版权保护形象

China Takes a Bite From Apple 中国作者咬苹果一口

Apple Suffers Setback in China Lawsuit Loss 苹果在华商标侵权案初尝苦果

China Considers New Bank Rescue 中国考虑出台措施援救银行

Having ordered the nation’s top banks to make massive dubious loans to local governments during the financial crisis, Beijing is now considering letting the banks delay collecting those debts, in what looks like a lack of will to deal with the problem. On the one hand, I can understand why Beijing might not want to risk billions of dollars in loan defaults for its major banks, many of which may be unable to collect payments from cash-strapped local governments. But on the other hand, this problem really does exist, and it won’t help the banks or Beijing to delay dealing with the situation. Many may recall that Japan’s banks faced a similar problem in the 1990s, when they struggled under piles of huge bad loans created by the bursting of a US real estate bubble. The Japanese banks’ refusal to deal with the problem was one of the major factors behind the country’s “lost decade” in the 1990s, which saw the country experience little or no growth. Of course China’s situation isn’t completely the same, but there are many similarities. Local government debt at the end of last year stood at a whopping $1.7 trillion, of which about $700 million is coming due for repayment this year, according to media reports. Fearing that local governments lack the cash to repay so much debt and could default on many loans, the Chinese banking regulator is seriously considering a plan to let banks delay collection of the debt by as much as 4 years, and could announce a formal plan by the end of this month, according to media reports. (English article) Such a plan, if put into effect, would rescue the banks in the short term by allowing them to hide a looming non-performing loan problem. But from an investor perspective, this kind of a move is likely to weigh heavily on the banks’ stocks, as people will be wary of buying shares in lenders whose bad debt levels are so dependent on government policy and could suddenly balloon if and when Beijing finally decides it needs to solve this problem. The situation is clearly unsustainable over the long term, and I’ll use this occasion to once again repeat my previous assertion that Beijing should either privatize its major lenders and use them as policy tools, or let them behave like true commercial banks and make their own decisions. If it wants to create a group of truly commercial lenders, it needs to stop telling them how to do their business and then allowing them to hide their problems through accounting tricks.

Bottom line: Beijing’s latest rescue plan for its lenders facing a looming mountain of bad debt is bad medicine for bank stocks, which are likely to face years of stagnation.

Related postings 相关文章:

Banks to Lend More, But to Whom? 银行获准增加放贷 但流向选择有限

China Banks: More Trouble Signs

Beijing’s Financial Shufflle: Bankers or Regulators? 中国金融高层“大换血”

 

Kaixin Looks to Cash in on Facebook Effect 开心网似乎在利用Facebook效应

Kaixin, China’s second biggest social networking site (SNS), has just released some new data that finally allow us to make some comparisons with industry leader Renren (NYSE: RENN), in what looks like a carefully timed move to restart its stalled IPO process to take advantage of hype surrounding the upcoming IPO for global leader Facebook. Frankly speaking, the Kaixin numbers look ok, but hardly seem to offer the kind of buzz the company would need to launch a hot IPO, especially in the current climate that has many US investors wary of Chinese companies following a series of accounting scandals last year. According to the handful of numbers given out by Kaixin, the company’s revenue grew 41 percent last year to about $60 million, while its registered user based reached 130 million, 60 million of whom were active users. (English article; Chinese article) The revenue looks rather weak compared to Renren, whose third-quarter revenue grew 57 percent to $34 million, meaning Renren is still about twice as big as Kaixin in revenue terms. (Renren Q3 announcement) In terms of users, Renren had 137 million registered users at the end of the third quarter, including 38 million unique users  logging in each month — figures that look similar but slightly stronger than Kaixin’s. What all this seems to say is that Kaixin and Renren are roughly equivalent in terms of their user numbers, but  that Renren has been more successful at parlaying its big user base into actual revenue, posting both stronger revenue and revenue growth compared to Kaixin. Despite its industry leading position, Renren shares have struggled since their IPO last year. They now trade at less than half their IPO level, though they got a nice bump after news first emerged that Facebook was preparing to file for its long awaited IPO, and are up about 20 percent since then. Kaixin is no doubt noticing the Facebook effect, and I suspect the company is now quietly scrambling behind the scenes to prepare its IPO documents so it can make a new filing in the next few weeks. Kaixin didn’t say whether it is profitable in its latest comments, which tells me it probably is still losing money, similar to Renren. But after months of shunning China stocks, perhaps the market is finally ready for another China Internet story, and Kaixin is clearly hoping to be that story. At the end of the day I could see a semi-successful offering for Kaixin, which in this case could be an IPO of about $100 million that probably won’t rise too much on its trading debut but also shouldn’t fall too much.

Bottom line: Kaixin’s release of limited new financial data indicate it may soon restart its stalled IPO, hoping to seize on hype generated by Facebook’s upcoming offering.

Related postings 相关文章:

Kaixin Raises Profile in Renewed IPO March 开心网一改低调有意再次赴美上市

Kaxin Buys Time With Tencent Tie-Up 开心网与腾讯合作堪称一箭双雕

Gaopeng, Kaixin Spotlight China Internet Turmoil 高朋网、开心网凸显中国互联网混乱现状

News Digest: February 14, 2012 报摘: 2012年2月14日

The following press releases and media reports about Chinese companies were carried on February 14. To view a full article or story, click on the link next to the headline.

══════════════════════════════════════════════════════

◙ China Tells Banks to Roll Over Local Govt Loans: Report (English article)

◙ iPad Confiscated in China After Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) Trademark Legal Loss (English article)

Kaixin001 2011 Revenue Up 41% (English article)

Tencent (HKEx: 700) and EA (Nasdaq: EA) Bring The Sims Social to China (Businesswire)

DuPont and Yingli Green Energy (Nasdaq: YGE) Enter $100 Million Strategic Agreement (PRNewswire)

◙ Latest calendar for Q1 earnings reports (Earnings calendar)

360Buy Losing Focus With Travel Plan 京东商城涉足在线旅行服务业 偏离核心业务

China’s Internet companies are famous for straying from their core businesses in pursuit of new growth even though such initiatives seldom work, and now e-commerce specialist 360Buy looks set to joint the club with a new travel services initiative. (English article) Nearly ever major Chinese Internet firm has dabbled in areas outside its core competency, with names like Baidu (Nasdaq: BIDU), Sina (Nasdaq: SINA) and Alibaba all making such initiatives, nearly all of which have ended in abysmal failures. None of these companies seem to have noticed that the big western names like Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) and Expedia (Nasdaq: EXPE) have succeeded largely by focusing on their core areas, and only expanding into new ones when they can leverage some of their existing expertise. So that makes the latest move by 360Buy, which also goes by the name Jingdong Mall, look perfectly consistent with what other Chinese companies have done. In this case, 360Buy says it will launch a hotel booking service, and that it has already signed up 20,000 hotels in China, Hong Kong and Macau as partners. A company spokesman said the move is part of the company’s drive to become a more diversified online services company, instead of just an e-commerce specialist. Never mind the fact that the online travel services sector is already quite competitive, dominated by Ctrip (Nasdaq: CTRP) and Expedia-controlled eLong (Nasdaq: LONG), or that Baidu also recently entered the space with its investment in a company called Qunar. (previous post) We should also ignore the fact that 360Buy is currently locked in a series of price wars with rivals like Dangdang (NYSE DANG), and that rival Alibaba has learned its lesson and remains focused on e-commerce after its foray into online search ended in a complete disaster several years ago. In fact, I suspect this latest initiative is probably designed to generate market interest in 360Buy, which wants desperately to make a New York IPO to raise much needed cash. 360Buy launched its IPO process last fall, only to see the offering fall victim to abysmal market sentiment due to a series of accounting scandals at US-listed Chinese companies. This new travel services initiative looks like fantasy to me, and an initiative that’s 95 percent likely to fail. But those kinds of difficult odds never stopped a Chinese company from this kind of initiative before, and I would expect to see a few more strange initiatives coming out of 360Buy before it relaunches its IPO bid, probably sometime in the first half of this year.

Bottom line: 360Buy’s new initiative in the travel services space is almost guaranteed to fail, and could be more designed to generate hype in the run-up to a US IPO later this year.

Related postings 相关文章:

E-Commerce: 360Buy Awaits IPO Window, Amazon Expands 京东IPO融资心切 亚马逊物流扩张加剧竞争

360Buy Heats Up E-Books, People’s Daily Goes to Market 京东商城高调进军电子书,人民网开启上市进程

Internet Investors Seek Refuge in Big Names 互联网投资者选择性支持中国市场领头羊

 

 

Huawei and ZTE: Swapping Networking for Cellphones? 华为和中兴:转型进军手机市场?

Telecoms superstars Huawei and ZTE (HKEx: 763; Shenzhen: 000063) continue to send out new signals underscoring how serious they are about developing their cellphone business, as both realize that growth potential could be severely limited for their traditional networking equipment business. In yet the latest signal coming from Huawei, the company is bragging that it shipped some 20 million smartphones last year, up 5-fold over the previous year. (Chinese article) That figure was enough to propel Huawei to the world’s sixth largest cellphone seller in 2011, with total cellphone sales jumping 40 percent to $6.8 billion. Of course that is still just a small part of the company’s overall sales, which are now in the $30 billion range. But Huawei clearly has big plans in the cellphone space, saying late last year it aims to become one of the world’s top 3 brands in the next 5 years. (previous post) Crosstown rival ZTE has made similar moves into the cellphone space, and has become particularly aggressive into low-end smartphone by making Android-based models that retail for less than $100. ZTE has also previously said it aims to become one of the world’s top 5 cellphone makers within the next 2 years, meaning that both of these Chinese companies could finding themselves increasingly fighting for the same customers on the global stage. The drive into cellphones, while risky and more competitive than traditional telecoms networking equipment, looks like a smart move for both companies, which increasingly realize that their traditional business is a difficult one with limited growth potential. Most of the world’s major telecoms equipment players are now struggling or have left the business outright, with names like Motorola and Nortel that were dominant players just a decade ago now non-existent. The few remaining names, including Nokia Siemens Networks and Alcatel Lucent (Paris: ALUA) have also struggled to remain profitable, with both making recent layoffs. Even Huawei itself reportedly recently delayed plans for a new factory in the important India market, where new network construction has virtually come to a halt amid a major government corruption scandal. (previous post) The networking equipment business is also notoriously cyclical, unlike cellphones that experience relatively constant demand. With all those factors in play, it’s not surprising to see both Huawei and ZTE looking to cellphones for stability, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see at least one of these 2 companies become one of the world’s top 3 brands in the next 3-5 years.

Bottom line: Huawei and ZTE are pursuing cellphones in response to higher risk and slowing growth in their networking business, with at least one likely to become a top global player in the space.

Related postings 相关文章:

Huawei Discovers Cellphones 华为手机要向世界前三进军

ZTE Gambles With Smartphone Share Grab 中兴通讯押注智能手机业务

Huawei Puts Brakes on India Drive 华为印度建厂计划推迟

Car Sales: Domestics Down, But Not Out 汽车销量:国产车下降,接近拐点

We’ve seen a mini flood of data come out over the past week from China’s auto makers, as they release January sales that show domestic players may finally be turning a corner after a miserable 2011 that saw them lose big market share to international rivals. What I like to call the “big 3” of Chinese domestic brands, Geely (HKEx: 175), Chery and BYD (HKEx: 1211; Shenzhen: 002594) all outpaced the broader market’s 24 percent decline for the month, as overall domestic sales tumbled due to timing of the Lunar New Year this year in January instead of the usual February. (English article) Of the big domestic 3, Chery easily looks the most promising, with sales actually gaining 17.5 percent for the month, making it one of the few non-luxury brands to post a gain. In fact, that figure is for Chery’s total sales, including both domestic and overseas, which is significant as the company has become China’s biggest auto exporter, with exports doubling over last year’s January level to now account for 12 percent of its total sales. Chery’s export drive looks like a smart direction, as its moves to find a foreign joint venture partner at home to boost its domestic sales have been a bit more problematic. Last year the company’s plans to make cars with Japan’s Subaru was rejected by the state planner, and the company’s most recent plan to make luxury cars with Jaguar Land Rover also looks questionable. (previous post) Meantime, Geely and BYD both saw their January sales drop by 16.5 percent and 15 percent, respectively. While it’s never good to see a big drop like that, both figures are still quite a bit better than the broader market’s 24 percent decline, meaning both companies may have finally reversed their downward slide for much of last year. Of course, BYD’s year-ago comparisons are relatively low now after its sales plunged in 2011, and Geely also has a similar advantage. But both companies finally seem to have realized that they need to keep making popular new models to keep their sales growing, with BYD announcing several new models late last year. Of course January is just a single month and things could easily change in the months ahead. But at least based on this early bit of data, 2012 could be the year when Chinese brands finally fight back against the big foreign names and see their market share stabilize.

Bottom line: Big Chinese auto brands could see their share of the domestic market stabilize in 2012, slowing steady gains over the last 2 years by major international car makers.

Related postings 相关文章:

2 China Car Brands Set for Renaissance? “上海”和“红旗”汽车将重出江湖

Chery Finds Foreign Partner in Jaguar 奇瑞与捷豹路虎联姻前景堪忧

Cars: US, Germany Clobber Japan, Domestic Rivals 美德汽车在华完胜日本和中国车商

News Digest: February 11-13, 2012 报摘: 2012年2月11-13日

The following press releases and media reports about Chinese companies were carried on February 11-13. To view a full article or story, click on the link next to the headline.

══════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Huawei Makes 20 Mln Smartphones in 2011, Up 5 Times From Previous Year (Chinese article)

◙ Wind Tower Makers in U.S. Hurt by China Imports, Trade Commission Finds (English article)

Dangdang (NYSE: DANG), Gome Form Strategic Partnership – Source (English article)

Geely (HKEx: 175) Announces January Sales (HKEx filing)

Joy Global Completes Tender Offer for International Mining Machinery (HKEx: 1683) (Businesswire)

◙ Latest calendar for Q1 earnings reports (Earnings calendar)

Alibaba Looks for Value With Delisting Plan 阿里巴巴计划退市以寻求价值

The online world has been buzzing since yesterday when Alibaba.com (HKEx: 1688), the only listed unit of e-commerce giant Alibaba Group, suspended trading of its shares pending a major announcement. Many, myself included, were eagerly awaiting an announcement from the parent Alibaba Group, which has been negotiating a buyback of the 40 percent in itself held by Yahoo (Nasdaq: YHOO); but few were expecting anything from the publicly listed Alibaba.com, which is the struggling B2B arm of the larger company. Now foreign media are citing unnamed sources saying Alibaba Group wants to privatize Alibaba.com, undoubtedly because it feels the unit is not fully appreciated by investors and could potentially drag down the parent company’s valuation as it seeks to buy out the Yahoo stake. (English article) Some recent investors have been saying since last summer that Alibaba Group could be worth as much as $30 billion, which would mark a huge increase over its value in 2005 when Yahoo purchased 40 percent of the company for just $1 billion. But with Alibaba.com valued at less than $6 billion based on its price before the Thursday trading halt, that valuation for the entire group looks difficult to justify. After all, Alibaba.com is one of the group’s oldest assets and presumably one of its most profitable, even though its growth has slowed considerably over the last year after a scandal emerged that saw the company’s CEO resign. The parent company’s other major assets include its Taobao Mall, recently rebranded as Tianmao (previous post), and its Alipay e-payments system, along with its original Taobao B2C online auctions site. But even if each of those assets is worth as much as Alibaba.com, which seems unlikely, the company would still have difficulty justifying the $30 billion valuation. The publicly listed Alibaba.com just announced today that its board will meet on February 21 to review and release the company’s latest quarterly results, which will undoubtedly show more disappointing growth. At the same time, I would expect it to announce the privatization plan, offering perhaps a premium of up to 20 percent over Alibaba.com’s last closing price as it seeks to remove its embarassingly low valuation from the market. After that happens, look for the parent company to move quickly with the privatization process so that it can completely de-list the unit before announcing its long-awaited Yahoo buyout that will give the parent company a valuation more to its liking.

Bottom line: Alibaba Group aims to eliminate an embarassingly low valuation for its Alibaba.com unit through a privatization plan.

Related postings 相关文章:

Alibaba: Let’s Get This Show Finished 阿里巴巴和雅虎赶紧“离婚”吧

Yahoo, Alibaba Dance Nears Finale  雅虎应与阿里巴巴撇清干系

Alibaba Scrambles to Prove High Valuation 阿里巴巴高估值或将作茧自缚

Mid-Sized Players Join China Fast Food Feast 国外中小快餐企业抢滩中国市场

The big boys like KFC, McDonalds (NYSE: MCD) and Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX) aren’t the only ones hoping to feast on China’s growing appetite for fast food, with 2 mid-sized players, ice cream specialist Dairy Queen and Pizza Hut also announcing big new expansion plans to cash in on the trend. For investors, these expansions by smaller players spotlight that China offers interesting potential for not only the big names, but could also make mid-sized players an interesting bet. Then again, these more mid-sized companies come with a bit more risk, as they often lack the resources of the bigger names to execute their expansions, and are more likely to withdraw from the market at any signs of trouble, creating potentially big losses. Let’s look first at Dairy Queen, a well-known US brand that has been quietly expanding in China over the last few years. The company, owned by billionaire investor Warren Buffett, recently opened its 500th store in China, and says it plans to add another 100 stores by the end of this year, after opening 131 new stores in 2011. (company announcement) Meantime, Pizza Hut, owned by Yum Brands (NYSE: YUM) has announced it will open at  least 150 new stores this year as it expands into third- and fourth-tier cities, part of a trend that is seeing restaurant operators move into smaller, less affluent Chinese cities in pursuit of growth. Both Pizza Hut and Dairy Queen represent a group of lower-profile foreign restaurant operators that have found varying degrees of success in China, joining other similar sized players like Japan’s Yoshinoya, Hong Kong-listed Ajisen (HKEx: 538) and US pizza chain Papa Johns (Nasdaq: PZZA). A key component to the success for both the larger and smaller players is finding a strong Asia partner to help navigate the often tricky China market, where foreign companies are often subject to much more scrutiny than local companies. Ajisen got a good lesson in the potential perils of the market last year, when many Chinese consumers boycotted the chain after it falsely claimed that its soups were made with fresh ingredients, dealing a huge blow to the company’s revenue. Negative campaigns like that could easily force some of these smaller companies to incur big losses and even withdraw from the market, spotlighting one of their biggest vulnerabilities. But if they have the right partner and backing, some of these companies could also look like strong bets to profit from China’s growing appetite for western fast food.

Bottom line: New expansion plans by Dairy Queen and Pizza Hut in China spotlight the market’s big potential for mid-sized fast food companies.

Related postings 相关文章:

Yum, Starbucks Forge Ahead in Face of Slowdown 百胜和星巴克逆势强劲增长

Starbucks Raises Prices, But Who Cares? 没人会在意星巴克提价

Growth-Hungry McDonalds Explores Risky Franchising Route