After writing far more negative than positive views about China Mobile (HKEx: 941; NYSE: CHL) I’m happy to say there’s finally a piece of news that I really like in the form of talk that the country’s cash-rich but uninspired dominant mobile carrier may soon take a stake in a national cable TV company now being assembled from a patchwork of regional operators. (English article) According to the reports, which cite a number of unnamed sources, China Mobile has already reached an agreement to partner with the new company, China Radio and Television Network, and the 2 sides are now in discussions about a potential equity investment by China Mobile. This kind of partnership looks like a great idea for both sides, as the new cable company will have a huge need for cash — something that China Mobile has plenty of — once the long-delayed consolidation of China’s cable TV networks into this single new company is complete. At the same time, the big piece missing in China Mobile’s portfolio of products is a good wire-based broadband service, something that rivals China Unicom (HKEx: 762; NYSE: CHU) and China Telecom (HKEx: 728; NYSE: CHA) both have from the wired-line phone networks they inherited years ago from China’s former fixed-line phone monopoly. A big cash infusion from China Mobile could help China Radio and Television Network quickly upgrade its numerous regional cable networks, now mostly based on older analog technology, to digital capabilities for broadband and other services like high-definition television and video on demand. China’s regulators would also be likely to welcome this tie-up, as the entry of a strong new player to the broadband market would provide a real alternative to offerings from Unicom and China Telecom, which are now being investigated by the National Development and Reform Commission, China’s state planner, for monopolistic practices in the area. Investors have long complained that China Mobile — which controls two-thirds of the world’s biggest mobile market — has too much cash and should pay a higher dividend, even though the company has failed to raise its dividend pay-out ratio for years. I have always been skeptical of China Mobile’s overseas acquisition strategy, mostly because it has no experience operating outside its highly protected home market. But this kind of equity tie-up would make much more sense, as it would come in China Mobile’s home market and also be highly complementary to its existing business. Of course such a tie-up isn’t completely risk-free, as the new cable company is an untested entity that still has yet to be formally launched. But if things proceed smoothly, I could see this partnership developing rapidly and perhaps even contributing to China Mobile’s stagnant top and bottom lines as soon as the second half of next year.
Bottom line: A new tie-up between China Mobile and China’s new national cable TV operator looks like a smart move, potentially providing China Mobile with a strong cable and digital TV offering.
Related postings 相关文章:
◙ Govt to Nat’l Cable Firm: Be Profitable 政府对国家广电公司的安排:商业化
◙ Cable Consolidation Moves Closer With New Umbrella Company 中国广播电视网络公司有望近期挂牌 有线网络整合步伐加快
◙ Telecoms Investigation Signals Profit Erosion 电信联通遭反垄断调查或侵蚀利润
A small brouhaha broke out yesterday in Beijing, after an executive from the Sinopec-led (HKEx: 386; Shanghai: 600028; NYSE: SNP) group that made an unsolicited bid for privately held natural gas distributor China Gas (HKEx: 384) told reporters there would be no new offer after the original bid was rejected. It seems the executive from ENN Energy (HKEx: 2688), which launched the bid with Sinopec last December, made his remarks quickly as he walked past reporters while attending meetings at the National People’s Congress taking place this week in Beijing. Sinopec followed up later in the day with a “clarifying” announcement saying the remarks were purely the opinion of the executive, and that no decision has been made yet about whether the group will make a new and higher offer. (
So, when is the dropping of the .com suffix from a company’s name big news? The answer: When you’re an Internet veteran like NetEase (Nasdaq: NTES), whose new announcement that it plans to formally change its name from NetEase.com to simply NetEase Inc will fuel expectation that the company is nearing a spin-off of its portal business, its oldest asset since it originally went public in the late 1990s. In a decidedly low-key announcement, NetEase said it has scheduled a rare extraordinary general shareholder meeting for March 29, at which owners of its stock will be asked to approve the name change. (
It seems Beijing has decided China’s companies need to innovate more and has instructed them to do so, resulting in a flood of new patents for Chinese companies and other entities that I suspect are worth little more than the paper they’re printed on. That’s my major conclusion for why the nation’s regional governments and companies are suddenly flooding the media with reports showing off how many new patents they’ve received, as all vie to comply with Beijing’s silly innovation directive. According to new statistics from the World Intellectual Property Organization, patent applications rose 10 percent globally last year, but China’s rise was 3 times that much at 33 percent. (
It seems the storm dumping rain on Chinese solar cell makers for most of the last year won’t end anytime soon, with Chinese media now citing gloomy industry watchers saying Europe is likely to soon launch an own anti-dumping investigation into the industry following a similar one in the US. (
The latest sign of an advertising slowdown on the Internet is coming from the high-flying Phoenix New Media (NYSE: FENG), whose investors did some profit-taking in Tuesday trade before the company announced impressive fourth-quarter results that saw its ad revenue double even as it predicted the rate of increase would slow quite a bit in the first quarter. (
I’ve been watching with interest these last few weeks as Jin Jiang (HKEx: 2006), one of China’s oldest and best known non-budget hotel brands, has been partnering with a US firm in a bid to compete with big international operators, making it a potentially interesting investment bet over the longer term if it can succeed. Of course, such success is far from assured, as Jin Jiang, despite its long history in China, still has much to learn to compete with the likes of Marriott (NYSE: MAR) and Hilton, both of which have far more experience and, equally important, reputations for operating top-notch hotels. But a couple of recent franchising deals look interesting enough to merit a mention here as a potential sign of big new developments for Jin Jiang. In the latest of those announcements, Interstate China, a joint venture hotel management company between Jin Jiang and US firm Thayer Lodging, has announced it will take over operation of the JC Mandarin hotel in Shanghai, one of the city’s oldest 5-star hotels whose image has faded somewhat in recent years as many of the bigger brands have opened newer and better-run properties. (