Bottom line: Washington’s punishment of a Chinese chipmaker accused of stealing from Micron Technology is part of a savvy targeted approach by the Trump administration aimed at spotlighting illegal business practices by Chinese tech firms.
Trump punishes China chipmaker for IP theft
I thought I’d begin this Monday with a wrap and look at what’s ahead for a Chinese chipmaker called Jinhua, which fell squarely in the crosshairs of Donald Trump’s trade war with Beijing in a series of breakneck developments last week. This particular case seems to be part of a growing pattern that is seeing Trump pick his battles one at a time, at least when it comes to handling Chinese technology companies.
We’ll review the details on this latest case involving Jinhua and its dispute with US chip giant Micron Technology (Nasdaq: MU) shortly. But the bigger picture is that Trump has accused Chinese companies of stealing US intellectual property and has made that issue central in his current push for a trade deal. Previously US companies with such complaints could only seek assistance from the courts, mostly in the US and EU, since few believe the Chinese court system could handle such cases effectively and objectively. But the government can obviously take action much more quickly and effectively, as Trump is showing with his latest actions. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: A court order barring Micron Technology from China and Donald Trump’s attempts to keep China Mobile out of the US reflect blurring lines between business and politics in heightening US-China trade tensions.
Fujian court bars Micron sales in China
Two new headlines are showing how trade tensions between the US and China are spilling over into the high-tech realm, while also reflecting a certain amount of confusion and twisting of the facts. Leading the somewhat misleading headlines is an item that has U.S. memory chip giant Micron (Nasdaq: MU) suddenly being shut out of China for a number of its products due to a patent dispute. The other headline has Donald Trump saying that leading Chinese telco China Mobile(HKEx: 941; NYSE: CHL) shouldn’t be allowed to offer services in the US due to national security concerns.
The Micron story is being spun by some media as having a US-China trade tensions angle, when really that’s not the case and it’s just a typical patent dispute. The same could be said for the much larger case involving a US ban on telecoms equipment maker ZTE (HKEx: 763; Shenzhen: 000063), which is being spun as part of US-China trade tensions, even though ZTE is being punished for violating much older US sanctions against sales to Iran. China Mobile, on the other hand, is clearly a Trump pet project and does reflect his protectionist tendencies. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: Growing national security concerns are likely to kill the pending purchase of Germany’s Aixtron by a Chinese buyer, and could also kill the pending sale of NXP’s standard products unit to a similar buyer.
Germany calls for review of Aixtron sale to China
A major cross-border chip deal that I failed to notice earlier this year is suddenly in doubt, with word that Germany has reversed course and wants a security review for the proposed sale of local chipmaker Aixtron (Frankfurt: AIXA) to a Chinese buyer. Such a move would mark the first potential killing of a cross-border chip deal in Europe, which would be following the US and Taiwan in voicing concerns about China’s sudden voracity for overseas makers of high-tech microchips. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: A Chinese buyer’s plan to purchase US chip maker Analogix for more than $500 million is unlikely to meet with political resistance, and could mark a new template for similar cross-border chip M&A by China.
Chinese group bids for US-based Analogix
After failing at several high-profile attempts to buy US microchip technology, China is trying once again with a newly announced plan to acquire venture-backed chipmaker Analogix Semiconductor for more than $500 million. Unlike previous failed efforts that targeted more mature companies, the acquisition target in this case is much younger, since Analogix was only founded in 2002.
This new deal looks strikingly similar to another one earlier this year that saw the Shanghai-based National Silicon Industry Group purchase a similarly young Finnish chipmaker called Okmetic in a deal that valued the company at nearly $200 million. (previous post) That deal and this latest one don’t appear to be related, though one can never be completely sure due to the vague descriptions of the buyers in both cases. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: New remarks by TSMC Chairman Morris Chang could signal a revival of several stalled mainland investments in Taiwan’s microchip sector, with new focus on creating mechanisms to prevent IP theft.
TSMC remarks hint at revival of China-Taiwan chip deals
New reports are citing one of Taiwan’s most influential technology executives saying he welcomes investment from China, offering a tantalizing new path to the island for Chinese high-tech firms who so far have been rebuffed in such moves. The new signals are coming from the chairman of leading Taiwanese high-tech chip maker TSMC (Taipei: 2330), who is saying he could accept a Chinese investor as a strategic stakeholder as long as the company doesn’t require a place on his company’s board. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: Midea’s plan to buy 30 percent of German robotics maker Kuka is likely to collapse due to EU resistance, reflecting growing wariness towards China’s global buying spree of western technology.
EU official sounds alarm at Midea’s Kuka buy
Alarmism at China’s growing string of global M&A is spreading from the US to Europe, with growing signs of resistance to the recently announced purchase by Chinese company of a major stake in a leading German robotics firm. Two separate new headlines point to the nascent resistance against the landmark deal announced 2 weeks ago, which would see Chinese home appliance maker Midea (Shenzhen: 000333) acquire 30 percent of Germany’s Kuka (Frankfurt: KU2G) for more than $1 billion. (previous post) According to the latest reports, a top European Union (EU) industry official and one of Kuka’s largest shareholders are separately expressing reservations about the deal, in what almost looks like a coordinated effort to show the uneasiness some Europeans are feeling. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: Unigroup’s cautious approach to the potential acquisition of a small US chip maker reflects political realities that make larger purchases difficult, dealing a setback to China’s dreams of quickly building a chip-making giant.
Unigroup buys into Lattice Semiconductor
After being rebuffed several times in the US and Taiwan, China’s ambitious Tsinghua Unigroup is back in the chip acquisition headlines with word that it’s exploring a possible purchase of smaller US chip designer Lattice Semiconductor (Nasdaq: LSCC). Unlike the earlier failed deals that were either outright acquisitions or purchases of major stakes worth billions of dollars, this latest deal is quite small both in dollar terms and stake size.
That would seem to indicate that Unigroup and its affiliated sister companies, all housed at the prestigious Tsinghua University, are shifting to a more cautious approach targeting smaller companies in their global M&A strategy. We saw a similar move earlier this month, when a Shanghai-based government-backed buyer bid for Okmetic (Helsinki: OKM1V), a Finnish chip design house with a market value of about $200 million. (previous post) Read Full Post…
Bottom line: China’s latest plan to buy Finnish chip maker Okmetic could get vetoed on national security concerns, reflecting foreign government concerns about selling technology companies to government-backed entities.
Finland’s Okmetic gets buyout bid from China
China’s ambitions of building a world-class high-tech microchip industry were in the headlines again last week, when the small Finnish chip maker Okmetic (Helsinki: OKM1V) revealed it had received a takeover bid from a government-backed company based in Shanghai. Beijing’s ambitions are understandable, since China currently buys over 60 percent of the world’s microchips to feed its vast manufacturing complex that makes everything from smartphones to computers and home appliances.
But recent resistance in the US and Taiwan has also highlighted reluctance by overseas governments to seeing their companies purchased by the big state-run vehicles that Beijing has recently set up to achieve its aims. Historically speaking, China has also achieved mixed results when the government backs big microchip projects, which often fall victim to government agendas that limit their ability to quickly respond to the fast-changing market. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: China is likely to lead the list of countries getting national security reviews for its US purchases over the next few years, reflecting Chinese companies’ growing pursuit of foreign technology and other sensitive expertise.
Treasury Department releases annual security report
The past year has been notable for a growing number of Chinese acquisitions in the US attracting national security reviews, and now a new report from the reviewing agency is providing some big-picture numbers about the trend. The headline figure from the new report by the US Treasury Department shows that it reviewed 24 proposed acquisitions of US firms by Chinese buyers in 2014, making China the biggest recipient of such reviews.
At the same time, the report also cast a spotlight on several other trends, including the spread of reviews outside the sensitive high-tech sector and into less conventional areas like real estate. One such deal surprised many last year, when the purchase of the storied Waldorf-Astoria hotel in New York to Chinese insurer Anbang for nearly $2 billion was subject to such a review. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: Western Digital’s planned sale of 15 percent of itself to a Chinese buyer stands a 50-50 chance of getting vetoed by Washington on national security grounds, which could throw Western Digital’s planned purchase of SanDisk into doubt.
Western Digital’s China tie-up unraveling?
Many have been writing about China’s mega purchase last year of a big stake in computer hard drive giant Western Digital (Nasdaq: WDC) as if it’s a done deal, even though the $3.8 billion tie-up has yet to formally close. Even the buyer, Tsinghua Unisplendour, appeared to believe its purchase of 15 percent of Western Digital was unlikely to attract controversy, and was already using the US company as part of plans to build up China’s first global memory chip giant.
But the tie-up could fall victim to US national security concerns, following Western Digital’s new disclosure that it’s extending a timeline for the deal to close due to scrutiny from Washington. It’s probably too early to say this particular deal will collapse, even though Western Digital was apparently caught off guard by the scrutiny it’s now receiving from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US (CFIUS), which reviews major cross-border high-tech deals for national security risks. Read Full Post…
Bottom line: Washington and Beijing risk seriously hindering global trade and M&A in high-tech products in the name of national security, and should be more transparent when blocking deals and trade over such concerns.
National security vetoes look increasingly protectionist
The national security debate was in 2 major headlines last week, as word emerged that Washington might consider blocking proposed major acquisitions of US companies by Chinese construction equipment giant Zoomlion (HKEx: 1157; Shenzhen: 000157) and memory chip maker Tsinghua Unisplendour. While neither deal has been vetoed yet, the talk comes less than a year after several Washington politicians expressed reservations that ultimately killed another deal by a Chinese company to purchase leading US memory chip maker Micron (Nasdaq: MU).
With the US entering an election year, the likelihood of more deals being killed for similar reasons could grow due to opposition from politicians seeking to curry favor from voters. The growing noise from Washington comes against a backdrop of similar moves by Beijing, which last year rolled out a new national security law that foreign technology firms said was overly invasive and discriminates against them. Read Full Post…
